By Jafar M Ramini

Jafar Ramini

Those of you who are familiar with my thoughts and writings know by now that I loathe invoking any religious edict to make my point. In this case the exception is justified.
You would have to be living in the deepest recesses of the Amazonian jungle or the farthest reaches of Outer Mongolia not to have heard of the death of ‘the devil’ that was Ariel Sharon.  Forgive me if I don’t shed a tear nor have a decent word to say about the dead but on this occasion I will just refrain from dancing over his grave.
Throughout the years since the Zionist movement first lusted after and gobbled up Palestine there have been many cruel leaders in Israel who appear to have been spawned by the devil himself.  They surpassed the wildest of our imaginations in their brutality and inhumanity. None more so than Ariel Sharon, the “King of Israel”.
It would take me forever to list the crimes perpetrated by this devil incarnate against us Palestinians. But I shall try.
Born Arik Scheinermann, the son of Belarus Jewish immigrants, Sharon, from the very beginning of his military and political career, was never interested in peace nor in co-existence with the indigenous Palestinian people. What he was really interested in was to wipe Palestine and Palestinians off the map. In an interview, by Donald Neff, for ‘Time Magazine’ in 1993 he was quoted as saying, “Our forefathers did not come here in order to build a democracy but to build a Jewish State.”
Later, in 1998, he told ‘Agence France Presse’, “It is the duty of Israel to explain to public opinion, clearly and courageously a certain number of facts that are forgotten with time.  The first of these is that there is no Zionism, colonization or Jewish State without the eviction of the Arabs and the expropriation of their lands.”
As his career progressed, first as a military commander and then as a politician, Sharon did not spare any opportunity to ethnically cleanse Palestine and took on the task with alacrity. Even Menachem Begin described him as “ a great general but a vicious man”.
1953: Kibya a small Palestinian town where Sharon lead a raid, ruthlessly destroying 45 houses and killing 69 Arab villagers.
1967: As a General during the 6-day war, Sharon ordered his tank battalion to roll over and crush Egyptian soldiers in the Sinai Desert.
1982: Sharon invaded the Lebanon, causing the death of 17,000 civilians and the destruction of most of Lebanon’s infrastructure.
He also presided over the massacre of over 1400 Palestinian refugee children, women and men in the Sabra and Shatila camps in Beirut.
This is an eyewitness account of that massacre:
Such was the atrocity of such an unspeakable act of utter inhumanity it was condemned by the UN General Assembly as genocide. Few, if any world leaders, appeared to notice.
2002: Under his watch the Jenin Massacre of 4 days was perpetrated, when more than 150 Israeli tanks, armored personnel carriers and artillery, backed by F-16 fighter jets, attacked Jenin refugee camp, home to 15,000 Palestinian refugees, living on one square kilometer of land.
In an article in the London “Times” of 1998 he was quoted as saying, “You don’t simply bundle people on to trucks and drive them away…. I prefer a more positive policy….to create, in effect, a condition that in a ‘positive’ way will induce people to leave.”
In the same year, addressing a meeting of the Tsomet Party he said; “Everybody has to move, run and grab as many (Palestinian) hilltops as they can to enlarge the (Jewish) settlements because everything we take now will stay ours…Everything we don’t grab will go to them.”
 Sharon devoted a great deal of time and energy to Yassir Arafat. By Arafat’s own count, Sharon tried to have him killed thirteen times. “All the governments of Israel for many years, Labor, Likud, all of them, made an effort to remove him from our society,” Sharon said.” We never succeeded.”
Perhaps, amongst some queuing up in their thousands to pay their respects to his memory are those who believe that, despite a career defined by brutality and destruction, Sharon appeared to play the pragmatist when he forcibly removed 8000 Jewish settlers out of the Gaza Strip. Quite the opposite. It was not done out of the goodness of his heart.  After the withdrawal from Gaza, the enclave has been besieged from land, sea and air; a most brutal and inhumane collective punishment imaginable of 1.7 million Palestinians. As for settlement activities, there are now 40 settlers in the West Bank for every one that was removed from Gaza.
To understand the measure of the man who was known as ‘the bulldozer’ read the words of Gilad Sharon, the son and heir in 2012:
 “Flatten all of Gaza. The Americans didn’t stop with Hiroshima – the Japanese weren’t surrendering fast enough, so they hit Nagasaki, too,” he wrote in the Jerusalem Post. Mr Sharon, also urged that the government should force the leadership of Gaza to capitulate by cutting its throat.
 “There should be no electricity in Gaza, no gasoline or moving vehicles, nothing. Then they’d really call for a ceasefire,” he wrote.
And let us not forget that Ariel Sharon approved the construction of the separation wall that dissects Palestinian land and separates Palestinian families from their farms and communities.
And now he is lying in state and we await the hoards of sycophants and hypocrites to file through while offering their condolences and showering praise and admiration on the ‘King of Israel’ and his legacy.
The King of Israel is dead. Here’s to the demise of his appalling legacy.


PFLP Prison Branch calls for intensified struggle to support prisoners


prisonerrThe branch of the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine in the occupation prisons called upon all Palestinian forces and factions to build a comprehensive and inclusive national framework to take up and lead the struggle on the ground to confront the occupation assaults against Palestinian prisoners and to activate all means to ensure their liberation.

In a statement released on January 11, the prison branch of the Front said that the current conditions within the occupation prisons must inspire a serious escalation in the forms and methods of mass action in support of the prisoners. The prison administration continues to escalate its methods of repression and attack against the Palestinian political prisoners.

The occupation continues its policy of medical neglect of prisoners as a method of punishment and revenge, said the Front, and it is re-activating the policy of solitary confinement and isolation. The latest Palestinian prisoner subject to this policy is the leader Ibrahim Hamed of al-Qassam Brigades.

These actions come in addition to continuing crack-downs on prisoners’ families during visits, searching, harassing, and detaining them; the occupation has refused to improve the visit conditions for prisoners from Gaza and facilitate visits. Furthermore, occupation authorities are assaulting prisoners and planting surveillance cameras in Ramon prison.

The PFLP Prison Branch said that these practices of terror against the prisoners are a normal part of the ongoing policy of the occupation state against our people in general. They called for international action in order to expose the crimes against prisoners and to hold occupation authorities accountable in international courts.

(Source / 12.01.2014)

Muslims to observe birth of Prophet Mohammad

Muslims to observe birth of Prophet Mohammad


Muslims to observe birth of Prophet Mohammad
Muslims celebrate Mawlid an-Nabi (Mevlid Kandili), which marks the birth of the Prophet Muhammad today.

Muslims will on Sunday night observe Mawlid, that celebrates the birth of prophet Mohammad all over the world.

It is celebrated to mark the Eid milad-un-Nabi, birthday of the Prophet Muhammad (PBUH). It is celebrated on the 12th day of Rabi al-Awwal, the fifth month of the Islamic Calendar. This year the day falls on 12 January.

During the Mevlid Kandili, a large number of people go to the mosques, pray to Allah (God) until late night. Muslims celebrate by focusing on the life and teachings of Prophet Muhammad. As with other holidays, Muslims also give to the poor.

Prophet Muhammad was born in the month of Rabi’ al-Awwal, the third month of the Islamic calendar, in A.D. 571. Muslims consider him God’s mercy to the world as he is the last in a series of monotheistic religions’ prophets and the person who presented Islam to the world. His personality and manners are seen as a sacred model to be emulated by all Muslims.

(Source / 12.01.2014)

Iran condemns Israel’s new settlement expansion plan

Laborers work at a housing construction site in an Israeli settlement in East al-Quds (Jerusalem). (File photo)

Laborers work at a housing construction site in an Israeli settlement in East al-Quds (Jerusalem).

The Iranian Foreign Ministry has “strongly” condemned the Israeli regime’s new plans to construct more illegal settlement units in the occupied Palestinian territories.

On Sunday, Iranian Foreign Ministry Spokeswoman Marzieh Afkham said Tel Aviv’s recent decision to further expand illegal settlements is “strong proof of the regime’s ongoing aggression” against Palestinians.

She called on the United Nations and other international and human rights bodies to show a serious reaction to the Israeli regime’s illegal actions and stop expansion of settlements.

On January 9, the Israeli rights group, Peace Now, said the Tel Aviv regime’s Housing Ministry had announced the construction of over 1,076 units in the illegally annexed East al-Quds (Jerusalem) and 801 more in the occupied West Bank.

The announcement came only days after the latest US efforts to broker direct talks between the Israeli regime and the Palestinian Authority ended in failure. Israeli settlements have been one of the main obstacles to the negotiations, which resumed in July 2013.

Over half a million Israelis live in more than 120 settlements built since Israel’s occupation of the Palestinian territories of the West Bank and East al-Quds in 1967.

The Israeli regime has been under fire from the international community, including its own allies, over its expansionist policies.

On Saturday, European Union foreign policy chief, Catherine Ashton, said new settlements in the occupied territories of Palestine are “illegal” and the main “obstacle” to peace in the Middle East.

Acting Palestinian Authority (PA) chief, Mahmoud Abbas, also said on the same day that he would not recognize Israel as a Jewish state, stressing, “Without East Jerusalem (al-Quds) as a capital of the state of Palestine, there will be no peace between us and Israel.”

(Source / 12.01.2014)

No Palestinian tears for Sharon.

No Palestinian tears for Sharon.

If you were to ask a 20-year-old Palestinian today about Ariel Sharon, you might be surprised how little this generation knows about him. The past eight years, in which Sharon became incapacitated, and the few years before that in which he had softened his radical stance, appear to have chipped away at the warmonger image that is still etched in the consciousness of almost every Palestinian over 25 years old.

More than any other Israeli military figure, Sharon seems to be present in every violent mark since the Nakba and creation of Israel.

He joined the Israeli army in 1948 and one of his first assignments by David Ben Gurion was in 1953 to establish Unit 101, which focused on retaliation to cross-border attacks by the Palestinian fedayeen (militants). After one such attack, Sharon’s men crossed into the Palestinian town of Qibya, then under Jordan’s rule, and killed 69 Palestinian villagers, two-thirds of whom were women and children. The Qibya massacre showed Sharon’s ruthlessness and would become a symbol of the brutal Israeli retaliations to any Palestinian resistance attacks.

The brutality of Sharon and his Unit 101 was on display again after the Israeli occupation in 1967. His unit was dispatched to the Gaza Strip specifically to root out the fedayeen from the refugee camps. People of the densely populated Jabaliya refugee camp in northern Gaza still remember Sharon and his bulldozers as they literally widened the streets of the camp by destroying homes on both sides of the road, so that Israeli army vehicles could travel easily while they patrolled the camp to crush the resistance.

As defense minister under Menachem Begin in 1981, Sharon turned to spearheading the settlement drive in both the West Bank and Gaza. The photo most etched in older Palestinian minds is that of Sharon on a hilltop with a map, and soldiers and settler leaders around him.

But perhaps the most negative memory for Palestinians of Sharon was his relentless war on the PLO and the invasion of Lebanon, the siege of Beirut and the Sabra and Shatila massacres in 1982. This sealed Sharon’s image in Palestinian minds as the “Butcher of Beirut.”

Sharon’s role in the massacres of the Palestinian camps brought condemnation in Israel that eventually led to his resignation and years of political inactivity. Nevertheless, he succeeded in one event at the end of 2000 to reinvent his radical image in Palestinian eyes. Shortly after the failure of the Camp David talks between Bill Clinton, Ehud Barak and Yasser Arafat, Sharon made his move. His controversial visit to Al-Aqsa Mosque on Sept. 28, 2000, flanked by 1,000 Israeli troops provoked mass demonstrations that were put down violently. The killings at Al-Aqsa sparked demonstrations throughout Palestine and among Palestinians living in Israel, which ushered in the second intifada.

But Sharon was able to use the event and Barak’s failure to bring peace to return to the limelight and get elected for the first time as prime minister of Israel. In the ensuing six years, Israel under Sharon reoccupied West Bank cities and erected the controversial wall deep in Palestinian lands. But at the same time, Sharon initiated the havrada (unilateral disengagement) strategy. This concept calls for Israel to unilaterally move from areas it is not interested in, such as the Gaza Strip and some parts of the West Bank, without a peace agreement. In 2005, under Sharon’s orders, Israel’s 8,500 settlers and soldiers pulled out of the Gaza Strip without a peace agreement or any political deal with Palestinians. The plan was to be followed by similar unilateral moves in the West Bank, but only Sharon’s health prevented him to follow through.

The past eight years in which Sharon has been in a coma might have slightly mellowed the picture of the former Israeli prime minister in the eyes of some, mainly young, Palestinians. But for the majority of Palestinians, there is little that can be done to remove the image of the “Butcher of Beirut,” the architect of the settlements and the provoker at Al-Aqsa from their minds. Palestinians are not going to shed any tears for the demise of Sharon.

(Source / 12.01.2014)

Bin Laden family at Saudi terrorist’s funeral in Riyadh

Funeral of the Saudi terrorist Majid al-Majid, who led a deadly attack on Iranian embassy in Beirut on November 19, 2013

Funeral of the Saudi terrorist Majid al-Majid, who led a deadly attack on Iranian embassy in Beirut on November 19, 2013
Saudi terrorist Majed al-Majid who led a recent deadly attack on the Iranian embassy in Beirut was buried in Saudi capital Riyadh on Saturday night, media reports say.

According to Arabic-language Al-Hadath news website al-Majid who was an al-Qaeda commander, was buried in Riyadh with presence of close relatives of slain al-Qaeda leader Osama bin Laden.

The website has acquired photos of the ceremony which was held at night with only a limited number of people, following increasing skepticism over al-Majid’s death which many suspected of not being natural.

Lebanese information sources told Al-Alam on January 2nd that al-Majid shared close ties with the Saudi spy chief, Prince Bandar bin Sultan.
The report raised doubts over his passing away being a ‘murder’ not a natural death because of the relationship.

However Lebanese officials announced their inspections couldn’t find any evidence suggesting un-natural causes for his death.

Al-Hadath wrote there had been threats of possible retaliation by al-Majid’s family as they suspected he was killed.

Wanted by the US, Saudi Arabia, Lebanon and Iran, Majed was the head of the Abdullah Azzam Brigades, an al-Qaeda-affiliated group which claimed responsibility for the Nov. 19 twin suicide bombings outside the Iranian Embassy in Beirut.

The attack killed 25 people, including an Iranian diplomat.

The Lebanese Army arrested Majed last month, but he died at a military hospital over the weekend before it had a chance to interrogate him.

(Source / 11.01.2014)

Officials: Efforts to lift Yarmouk siege have failed

RAMALLAH (Ma’an) — Efforts to send supplies into Syria’s besieged Yarmouk camp are still futile, Palestinian officials said Sunday.

“All efforts to end the siege on Yarmouk camp have failed,” the director of the Palestinian Democratic Union told Ma’an.

There was “an incident that occurred at the entrance of the camp, preventing the entry of supplies,” Khalid Abu al-Haija said, without elaborating.

A PLO Executive Committee member said that the presence of militants in Yarmouk camp impeded the entry of supplies, due to a heavy exchange of fire.

Ahmad Majdalani said that Palestinian officials would continue their efforts to “save refugees in Yarmouk camp.”

“We are in intensive contact with Syrian officials and militants in Palestinian camps in Syria in order to reach a solution and create a safe passage for the entry of relief supplies to Yarmouk,” Majdalani said.

The lives of refugees are in danger, he said.

Earlier Sunday, Fatah Central Committee Member Muhammad Shtayyeh told Ma’an that the siege on Yarmouk would be lifted “tomorrow.”

Also Sunday, the Syrian Observatory for Human Rights said at least 43 Palestinians had died in Yarmouk camp as a result of starvation and medicine shortages throughout the past three months.

After rebels seized control of Yarmouk in December 2012, the camp became embroiled in the armed fighting taking place across Syria and came under heavy regime assault.

Regime forces eventually encircled the camp and in July imposed a siege on the camp, leading to a rapid deterioration of living conditions.

Fatah leader Abbas Zaki told Ma’an in mid-October that Yarmouk’s population of 250,000 had dwindled to 18,000 after two and a half years of conflict in Syria.

The Syrian conflict, which began as peaceful protests in March 2011 but developed into a civil war, has killed more than 130,000 people and prompted millions to flee their homes.

More than 760,000 Palestinians — estimated today to number 4.8 million with their descendants — were pushed into exile or driven out of their homes in the conflict surrounding Israel’s creation in 1948.

(Source / 11.01.2014)

Atrocities & Bantustans: The Legacy of Ariel Sharon

During more than a half century in the Israeli military and politics, Ariel Sharon became a figure reviled by Palestinians, the Arab world, much of the international community, and even by many Israelis. He was responsible for numerous atrocities and war crimes, including the killing of tens of thousands of Palestinian, Lebanese, and other civilians, destroying thousands of Palestinian homes, and the theft and colonization of massive amounts of occupied Palestinian land. Although some revisionists and Sharon supporters claim that he had turned over a new leaf and was prepared to make painful concessions towards peace with the Palestinians prior to suffering a massive stroke and falling into a coma in January 2006, the facts lead to a very different conclusion.

The following fact sheet provides an overview of Sharon’s war crimes and crimes against humanity, which continue to have a devastating impact on both the victims of his actions and the chances for peace between Israelis and Palestinians.


    • In the early 1950s, as a young major in the Israeli army, Sharon led the infamous Unit 101, which carried out numerous cross-border “pre-emptive” and “retaliatory” attacks into the West Bank (then under Jordanian control following the recent creation of Israel and attendant mass expulsions of Palestinians), deliberately killing and wounding Palestinian civilians.
  • In the most notorious incident involving Unit 101, between October 14 and 16, 1953, soldiers under Sharon’s command massacred 69 Palestinian civilians, most of them women and children, in the West Bank town of Qibya. Sharon’sorders included “total destruction of the village and maximum harm to the villagers, again forcing them to flee.” Many victims were barricaded inside their homes by Israeli troops, who then blew them up with dynamite. Others were shot as they attempted to escape. Some 45 houses, a school and a mosque were destroyed. In a report to the UN Security Council, Major General Vagn Bennike, chief of staff of the United Nations Truce Supervision Organization (UNTSO), wrote:

    “Bullet-ridden bodies near the doorways and multiple hits in the doors of the demolished homes indicated that the inhabitants had been forced to remain inside while their homes were blown up over them.”

  • Following an international outcry, the massacre was condemned by the UN Security Council and U.S. State Department, which expressed its “deepest sympathy for the families of those who lost their lives,” adding that those responsible “should be brought to account and that effective measures should be taken to prevent such incidents in the future.”


  • On October 29, 1956, Israel attacked Egypt, part of an invasion in conjunction with Britain and France. During the resulting hostilities, soldiers under Sharon’s command committed a series of massacres of POWs, including more than 100 civilians. In one incident, Israeli soldiers shot and killed 49 Egyptian prisoners of war, including civilians, after binding their hands and forcing them into a quarry. In another, 56 Egyptian civilians were murdered while sheltering in the back of a truck. An Israeli colonel who witnessed the truck massacre later stated: “It was simply shocking… When they opened the back of the truck, the bodies poured out one on top of the other… I couldn’t stand the thought that we shot these people without a battle.” In a third incident, some 50 Egyptian civilian workers were murdered by Israeli soldiers near the town of Ras Sudar.


    • Following Israel’s surprise attack against Egypt in June 1967, which resulted in Israel’s occupation of the Gaza Strip, West Bank, East Jerusalem, the Egyptian Sinai peninsula, and Syrian Golan Heights, Ariel Sharon, by now a general responsible for Israel’s southern command, was tasked with “pacifying” Gaza.
    • Sharon’s forces destroyed between 2000 and 6000 Palestinian homes, including large swaths of refugee camps and large tracts of agricultural land, displacing thousands of Palestinians, most of them refugees expelled from their homes in what became southern Israel in 1948.
  • With the Gaza “pacification,” Sharon set the tone for decades of severe Israeli repression in Gaza, which would eventually include the ongoing illegal siege and blockade imposed on the tiny, overcrowded coastal strip since 2007.


    • On June 6, 1982, Israel launched a massive invasion of Lebanon, masterminded by then-Defense Minister Sharon. During the 1970s, the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO), which was based in Lebanon following its expulsion from Jordan, made steady diplomatic gains in the international arena and there was increasing pressure on Israel to talk to its leadership. With his invasion, Sharon hoped to either totally destroy the PLO, or weaken it and drive it back to armed struggle and acts of terrorism, thereby alienating western powers, destroying the PLO’s international legitimacy, and removing pressure on Israel to deal with it. General Rafael Eitan, chief of staff of the Israeli army under Sharon, laterdescribed the invasion as a success because it “destroyed the PLO as a candidate for negotiations.”
    • Sharon’s plan also envisioned creating a new map of the region by installing a puppet government in Lebanon headed by Israel’s right-wing Lebanese Christian Maronite allies, the Phalange Party, whose founder, Pierre Gemayal, was inspired by a visit to Nazi Germany in 1936.
    • In 1981, the UN brokered a ceasefire between the PLO and Israel (which had been occupying southern Lebanon since invading in 1978). Over a period of nine months, Israel repeatedly violated the ceasefire in an effort to provoke a response that would justify the large-scale invasion that Sharon had been long planning. When PLO restraint failed to provide Sharon with an adequate pretext, he used the attempted assassination of Israel’s ambassador to England as a casus belli, despite the fact that Israeli intelligence believed correctly that the PLO had nothing to do with the assassination attempt (it was actually carried out by a renegade PLO splinter group that was at war with both Israel and the PLO).
    • Between June and September, the Israeli army killed between 18,000 and 20,000 Lebanese and Palestinian civilians, bombarding and laying siege to the western half of the capital of Beirut, where the PLO and its Lebanese allies were based. The scope and scale of the carnage were so disturbing that even U.S. President Ronald Reagan, whose administration gave a “green light” to the invasion, was outraged, calling Israeli Prime Minister Menachem Begin on August 12 following a particularly bloody bombardment of west Beirut that killed 300 people and personally demanding that Israel cease fire.
  • The Israeli army would eventually withdraw to southern Lebanon, which it would continue to militarily occupy, brutally repressing local resistance directly and indirectly through local proxy militias, for almost two decades. Only in 1999, following years of armed resistance by militant groups such as Hezbollah, which was formed in the aftermath of the 1982 invasion, did Israel withdraw from southern Lebanon.


    • On September 15, 1982, following the departure of Yasser Arafat and the last of thousands of Palestinian fighters from Beirut two weeks earlier, part of a U.S.-brokered ceasefire, Defense Minister Sharon violated the ceasefire agreement and occupied west Beirut, where the Palestinian refugee camps of Sabra and Shatila are located. Despite assurances given to the PLO by the Reagan administration that hundreds of thousands of Palestinian civilians left behind would be protected by international forces including U.S. marines who had landed to facilitate the evacuation of the PLO, the international forces withdrew prematurely on September 13, leaving the remaining Palestinian civilians defenseless.
    • On September 16, under Sharon’s direction, Israeli soldiers surrounded Sabra and Shatila and sent in about 150 of their local Christian Phalangist militia allies, even though the long and bloody history between Palestinians and Phalangists in Lebanon was well known to the Israelis, and despite the fact that the Phalangists’ leader, Bashir Gemayel, had been assassinated just two days earlier and Palestinians were rumored (incorrectly) to be responsible. That evening, the Israeli cabinet was informed that the Phalange had entered Sabra and Shatila, prompting Deputy Prime Minister David Levy to declare:

      “I know what the meaning of revenge is for them, what kind of slaughter. Then no one will believe we went in to create order there, and we will bear the blame.”

    • Over the next three days, between 800 and 3500 Palestinian refugees and Lebanese, mostly women, children, and the elderly, were butchered by the Phalangists, who sexually assaulted, tortured and mutilated many of their victims, in one of the worst atrocities in the modern history of the Middle East.
    • Soon after the killing started, Israeli soldiers surrounding Sabra and Shatila became aware that civilians were being murdered, but did nothing to stop it. Instead, Israeli forces fired flares into the night sky to illuminate the darkness for the Phalangists, allowed reinforcements to enter the camps on the second day of the massacre, and provided bulldozers that were used to dispose of the bodies of many of the victims, one of the reasons the number of victims remains uncertain.
    • Sharon would later claim he had no way of knowing that the Phalange would harm civilians. However, when U.S. diplomats demanded to know why Israel had broken the ceasefire and entered west Beirut, Israeli army Chief of Staff Rafael Eitan justified the move saying it was “to prevent a Phalangist frenzy of revenge ” in the wake of Gemayel’s assassination. Contradicting himself, Eitan also told American officials that he feared “a relentless slaughter” if the Phalange entered the camps. On September 15, the day before the massacre began, Israeli Prime Minister Menachem Begin told U.S. envoy Morris Draper that the Israelis had to occupy west Beirut, “Otherwise, there could be pogroms.”
    • On the second day of the massacre, Friday, September 17, an Israeli journalist in Lebanon called Sharon to inform him of reports that a massacre was taking place in Sabra and Shatila. The journalist, Ron Ben-Yishai, later recalled:

      “I found [Sharon] at home sleeping. He woke up and I told him ‘Listen, there are stories about killings and massacres in the camps. A lot of our officers know about it and tell me about it, and if they know it, the whole world will know about it. You can still stop it.’ I didn’t know that the massacre actually started 24 hours earlier. I thought it started only then and I said to him ‘Look, we still have time to stop it. Do something about it.’ He didn’t react.”

    • On Saturday, the third day, American Envoy Morris Draper sent a furious message to Sharon stating:

      “You must stop the massacres. They are obscene. I have an officer in the camp counting the bodies. You ought to be ashamed. The situation is rotten and terrible. They are killing children. You are in absolute control of the area, and therefore responsible for the area.”

    • The Phalangists finally left the camps on Saturday morning, taking many of the surviving men with them for interrogation at a soccer stadium. The interrogations were carried out with Israeli intelligence agents, who handed many of the captives back to the Phalange. Some of the men returned to the Phalange were later found executed.
    • Following domestic and international outrage, the Israeli government established a committee of inquiry, the Kahan Commission. Its investigation found that Sharon bore “personal responsibility” for the massacre and recommended that he be removed from office. He was removed from his post as defense minister, but remained in Begin’s cabinet as a minister without portfolio. A few months later, he was appointed Minister of Industry, Trade and Labor in Shimon Peres’ coalition government. He would go on to serve in different ministerial positions in successive Israeli governments almost continually between 1984 and 1999 before becoming leader of the Likud Party following Netanyahu’s loss to Labor Party leader Ehud Barak in 1999.
    • In June 2001, lawyers for 23 survivors of the massacre initiated legal proceedings against Sharon in a Belgian court, under a law allowing people to be prosecuted for war crimes committed anywhere in the world.
    • In January 2002, Phalange leader and chief liaison to Israel during the 1982 invasion, Elie Hobeika, was killed by a car bomb in Beirut. Hobeika led the Phalangist militiamen responsible for the massacre, and had announced that he was prepared to testify against Sharon, then prime minister of Israel, at a possible war crimes trial in Belgium.
  • In June 2002, a panel of Belgian judges dismissed war crimes charges against Sharon because he wasn’t present in the country to stand trial. With his stroke and coma in 2006, efforts to hold Sharon accountable for the slaughter in Sabra and Shatila came to an end.


    • Starting in the 1970s, Sharon became one of the leading champions of the drive to colonize the territories Israel occupied during the 1967 war, a war crime under the Fourth Geneva Convention. From the start, Sharon and other Israeli leaders used Israel’s Jewish settlement enterprise to cement Israeli control over the occupied territories and to forestall efforts to create an independent Palestinian state there.
    • As head of various government ministries over more than two decade, Sharon encouraged and advanced the colonization of occupied Palestinian land at every opportunity. As housing minister in the early 1990s, he oversaw the largest expansion of Jewish settlements on occupied Palestinian land since the start of the occupation in 1967. During the 1990s, while Israel was negotiating the Oslo Accords with the PLO, Sharon encouraged settlers to “grab every hilltop” in the West Bank in order to create irreversible “facts on the ground” before a final peace agreement could be signed. Today there are more than 500,000 Jewish settlers living in occupied East Jerusalem and the West Bank, their numbers constantly growing. The settlement enterprise that Sharon bore so much responsibility for is now the greatest obstacle to the realization of the two-state solution, which has been the cornerstone of international efforts to make peace in the region for decades.
    • In planning the locations of settlements, Sharon attempted to divide and sever Palestinian population centers from one another and the outside world, creating a number of easily-controlled Bantustans surrounded by walls, Israeli colonies and Israeli-only roads, military bases, and checkpoints. Nearly a decade after Sharon fell into a coma, the Bantustan model he championed to control Palestinians in the occupied territories continues to become more entrenched by the day.
    • In May 2003, former Italian Prime Minister Massimo D’Alema revealed that during a meeting Sharon had explained to him at length that apartheid South Africa’s “Bantustan” system, which the white regime used to contain and control the black population, was the best solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.
    • Sharon demonstrated his personal dedication to the settlement enterprise, and assertion of control over occupied East Jerusalem, by buying a home in the Muslim Quarter in the Old City and hanging large Israeli flags from the building, as is the custom of settlers in the Old City and elsewhere.
  • As defense minister, Sharon oversaw the dismantling of a settlement in the occupied Egyptian Sinai peninsula as part of the 1979 peace treaty with Egypt, in an act sometimes cited by his supporters as a bold move for peace foreshadowing the withdrawal of settlers from Gaza in 2005. In reality Israel’s willingness to relinquish the Sinai was part of a strategic decision to neutralize Egypt, the largest and most powerful Arab state. Doing so freed up Israeli forces to suppress Palestinian resistance in the occupied territories and Lebanon, and to continue its occupation and colonization of the West Bank, East Jerusalem, Gaza and the Syrian Golan Heights. In August 1980, Israel reaffirmed its annexation of occupied East Jerusalem in a move once againstrejected by the UN and international community, and in December 1981 Israel effectively annexed the Syrian Golan Heights. In June 1982, just two months after the dismantling of the Yamit settlement in the Sinai, Sharon launched his full-scale invasion of Lebanon, something Israeli military leaders would likely never have attempted if they still had to worry about Egypt attacking Israel’s southern flank.


    • In spite of the disgrace resulting from his disastrous invasion of Lebanon and the horrors of Sabra and Shatila, which led to his removal as defense minister, by the late 1990s Sharon had returned to the center of power in Israel, becoming leader of the Likud Party following Netanyahu’s loss to Labor Party leader Ehud Barak in 1999.
    • On September 28, 2000, amidst rising tensions between Israelis and Palestinians following the failure of U.S.-sponsored negotiations at Camp David and seven years of peace talks that witnessed a doubling of the number of Jewish settlers living on occupied Palestinian land (in no small part due to Sharon) and increasingly draconian Israeli restrictions on Palestinian movement, Sharon made a visit to the Noble Sanctuary mosque complex in occupied East Jerusalem – one of the most sensitive religious sites in the world – accompanied by 1000 Israeli police officers. His goal was to assert Israeli sovereignty over the site and to seek favor with right-wing voters ahead of elections.
    • Prime Minister Barak approved the visit, despite warnings from PLO leader Yasser Arafat and others that doing so would likely result in violence. When he heard that Sharon was going to visit the Noble Sanctuary, U.S. envoy Dennis Ross, known for his strong pro-Israel positions, remarked: “I can think of a lot of bad ideas, but I can’t think of a worse one.”
    • As predicted, Sharon’s visit provoked civil unrest, which Israeli security forces responded to with lethal force. The day after Sharon’s visit, seven Palestinians were killed and 100 wounded. The next day, Israeli forces killed 10 more Palestinians, setting off a spiral of violence that became the Second Intifada (uprising) against Israel’s occupation. According to UN figures, by the end of November, 247 Palestinians had been killed by Israeli forces, including 13 Palestinian citizens of Israel, and approximately 10,000 wounded, almost of half of them children. Many of the victims were shot in the head with live ammunition by snipers.
    • In February 2001, riding a wave of aggressive nationalist sentiment following the outbreak of the Second Intifada, Sharon defeated Barak in an electoral landslide. Upon assuming power the following month, Sharon ended diplomatic contacts with the PLO, effectively ending the peace process, despite pleas from Arafat to continue negotiations.
    • In a repeat of his efforts to destroy the PLO and crush resistance in Gaza in the 1970s, Prime Minister Sharon used extreme force, including large-scale military operations, assassinations of Palestinian political and military leaders, mass incarceration of Palestinians, and mass demolitions of Palestinian homes to suppress the Second Intifada. According to Israeli human rights organization B’Tselem, between September 2000 and September 2005, Israel assassinated 187 Palestinians, killing almost 300 innocent bystanders in the process.
    • In March 2002, Sharon launched a massive assault on the West Bank called Operation Defensive Shield, reoccupying areas that Israeli soldiers had redeployed from as part of the Oslo Accords. Human rights groups subsequently documented numerous war crimes carried out by Israeli forces during Operation Defensive Shield and related military actions, including the use of excessive force, widespread, wanton destruction and vandalism of Palestinian property, including schools, medical clinics and mosques and churches. Israeli soldiers denied the wounded access to medical care, causing many unnecessary deaths, attacked ambulances, and shot at Palestinians as they attempted to help the wounded and retrieve the bodies of the dead.
    • Between February and the end of June 2002, the Israeli army killed almost 500Palestinians. According to Amnesty International, “many of these IDF killings appeared to be unlawful and at least 16% of the victims, more than 70, were children.” Amnesty also reported that more than 8000 Palestinians were detained in mass round-ups over the same period and “subjected to ill-treatment,” and more than 3000 Palestinian homes were demolished. Amnesty’s report, entitled Shielded From Scrutiny: IDF Violations In Jenin And Nablus, stated:

      “Bodies remained in the street as residents who ventured outside to collect or attend to the dead or injured were shot. Tanks travelling through narrow streets ruthlessly sliced off the outer walls of houses; much destruction of property by tanks was wanton and unnecessary. In one appalling and extensive operation, the IDF demolished, destroyed by explosives, or flattened by army bulldozers, a large residential area of Jenin refugee camp, much of it after the fighting had apparently ended.”

After witnessing the destruction wrought by Sharon’s forces in Jenin, Javier Zuniga, Amnesty International’s Director of Regional Strategy, remarked:


“I have been in urban environments where house to house fighting has happened: Rwanda, Nicaragua, El Salvador, Colombia, and a city struck by a massive earthquake: Mexico City. The devastation seen in Jenin camp had the worst elements of both situations. Houses not just bulldozed or dynamited but reduced almost to dust by the repeated and deliberate coming and goings of bulldozers and tanks. Houses pierced from wall to wall by tank or helicopter gun ships. Houses cut down the middle as if by giant scissors. Inside, an eerie vision of dining or bedrooms almost intact. No signs whatsoever that that bedroom or dining room or indeed the house had been used by fighters. Gratuitous, wanton, unnecessary destruction.”

  • According to Israeli human rights organization B’Tselem, between September 2000 and September 2005, Israeli forces killed more than 3200 Palestinians, including at least 657 minors. During the same period, Palestinians killed 972 Israelis, according to B’Tselem, including 80 minors.


    • In 2002, under the pretext of security during the Second Intifada, Sharon’s government began construction of a wall to separate Israelis from Palestinians in the West Bank, including large parts of Palestinian West Bank land on the western or Israeli side.
    • When finished, the wall, along with the settlements, Israeli-only roads and closed military zones, are projected to cover approximately 46% of the West Bank, effectively annexing it to Israel.
    • The wall also surrounds much of occupied East Jerusalem, cutting its approximately 200,000 Palestinian residents off from the rest of the occupied West Bank, and millions of West Bank Palestinians from holy and other sites in Jerusalem.
    • In July 2004, the International Court of Justice (ICJ) issued an advisory opiniondeeming the wall illegal, as most of it (85%) has been or will be built on Palestinian land inside the occupied West Bank rather than along Israel’s internationally recognized pre-1967 borders with the West Bank.
  • During construction of the wall, Israel destroyed large amounts of Palestinian farmland, cut off thousands of Palestinians from their land, and usurped Palestinian water supplies.


    • In October 2004, after enduring a two-year siege by the Israeli military imposed by Sharon in his West Bank headquarters, PLO leader Yasser Arafat fell seriously ill. Two weeks later he was transported to a French military hospital where he died. Doctors concluded he died from a stroke caused by a mysterious blood disorder. Tests by Swiss forensics experts subsequently found traces of Polonium-210, a radioactive substance produced in nuclear reactors that had previously been used in the high-profile assassination of a former KGB agent in England, in Arafat’s remains.
    • Given that Sharon had spent years attempting to kill Arafat as part of Israel’slongstanding policy of assassinating Palestinian leaders, including through theuse of poison, many Palestinians suspected Israel was responsible for Arafat’s sudden demise. Israel is also the only country in the region known to have a nuclear reactor and the motive to kill Arafat.
  • Although Israeli officials have strenuously denied killing Arafat, six months before Arafat’s death Prime Minister Sharon told the Bush administration that assurances he had given the U.S. that Israel wouldn’t kill Arafat were no longer in effect, stating: “I released myself from the commitment in regard to Arafat.” Two years prior, in an interview published in February 2002, Sharon told an Israeli journalist that he regretted not killing Arafat when he had the chance during Israel’s invasion of Lebanon in 1982, stating: “I am sorry that we did not liquidate him.”


    • In 2004, after concluding that protecting the approximately 8000 radical settlers in Gaza wasn’t worth the price, Prime Minister Sharon announced a withdrawal of settlers and soldiers from the tiny coastal strip. Since occupying tiny, overcrowded and impoverished Gaza, Israeli political and military leaders had struggled to control it. Summing up the attitude of many Israeli leaders, shortly after signing the Oslo Accords in the early 1990s then-Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin stated that he wished Gaza “would just sink into the sea.”
    • Some Israelis and their supporters have attempted to present the so-called “disengagement” plan as evidence that Sharon had turned over a new leaf late in life and was making painful concessions towards peace with the Palestinians. In fact, the Gaza withdrawal was intended to kill the peace process by putting it in “formaldehyde,” in the words of Dov Weisglas, a senior advisor to Sharon and one of the architects of the disengagement, In October 2004 Weisglasexplained to an interviewer:

      “The significance of the disengagement plan is the freezing of the peace process.

      “And when you freeze that process, you prevent the establishment of a Palestinian state, and you prevent a discussion on the refugees, the borders and Jerusalem. Effectively, this whole package called the Palestinian state, with all that it entails, has been removed indefinitely from our agenda. And all this with authority and permission. All with a presidential blessing and the ratification of both houses of Congress.

      “The disengagement is actually formaldehyde… It supplies the amount of formaldehyde that is necessary so there will not be a political process with the Palestinians.”

    • In September 2005, amidst much media hype, Israel completed its withdrawal of settlers and soldiers from the interior of Gaza. Despite the pullout, Gaza remains under Israeli military occupation according to international law as Israeli forces maintain “effective control” over the area.
    • As a result of the Gaza withdrawal and resulting rebellion in his hardline Likud Party, Sharon left the party and formed the new Kadima party in November 2005, which today has only two members in the Israeli parliament.
    • While withdrawing settlers and soldiers from Gaza, Sharon expanded Jewish settlements in occupied East Jerusalem and the West Bank. As noted by Human Rights Watch: “the overall
      number of settlers in occupied territory increased significantly during [Sharon’s] term as prime minister.”
    • In January 2006, Sharon suffered a massive stroke and fell into a coma from which he never recovered. On January 11, 2014, he was pronounced dead at the age of 85.
  • Following Sharon’s death, Human Rights Watch issued a statement titled: Ariel Sharon’s Troubling Legacy. In the statement, HRW’s Middle East and North Africa director, Sarah Leah Whitson, observed:

    “It’s a shame that Sharon has gone to his grave without facing justice for his role in Sabra and Shatila and other abuses. His passing is another grim reminder that years of virtual impunity for rights abuses have done nothing to bring Israeli-Palestinian peace any closer.”

(Source / 11.01.2014)

Dozens of Palestinians wounded in West Bank protests

RAMALLAH, Palestinian Territories: Palestinian police clashed Sunday with West Bank youths who were protesting against a UN strike that has paralysed services in refugee camps leaving dozens wounded, sources said.

United Nations Relief and Works Agency employees have been on strike for more than a month, forcing cash-strapped UNRWA to shut schools and stop collecting garbage from West Bank refugee camps.

Palestinian police fired tear gas and live ammunition in the air to prevent youths from the Jalazun refugee camp in the central West Bank from blocking the road between Ramallah and Bir Zeit, an AFP correspondent said, adding that many were injured.

Palestinian security services spokesman Adnan Damiri told AFP that 40 policemen were wounded in the clashes, including 22 who had to be hospitalised.

Director of Jalazun camp Jumaa Shaaban told AFP the “protest was organised by popular committees from all the camps” and that demonstrations also took place in other West Bank camps.

(Source / 12.01.2014)

Syrian Coalition: Political Solution Impossible Without Assad’s Departure

Ahmad Jarba, head of the Syrian Coalition, stressed that “a political solution cannot be achieved with Assad remaining in power, as he is the main obstacle to the aspirations of the Syrian people,” during a meeting with French Foreign Minister in Paris. Both officials discussed the situation on all battlefronts in Syria, especially the remarkable progress achieved by the FSA and other opposition factions against regime forces and ISIS militias, who Jarba described as “an integral part of the terrorist Assad regime.” The meeting comes ahead of the Friends of Syria meeting, which began today and was attended by officials from 11 countries to discuss the course of the Syrian revolution and the methods that may bring about a solution to the Syrian crisis. Louay Safi, spokesman for the Syrian Coalition, said earlier that the Coalition’s participation in Geneva II will be dependent on the response of the international community to the basic demands set forth by the Syrian Coalition.” Safi points out that “no one can provide real guarantees for the success of Geneva II,” adding that “the only guarantees that may ensure the success of this conference is the ability of both sides to reach the proposed goals during the negotiations.” Furthermore, Safi stresses that “there must be a timetable for the negotiations, as this cannot be an open-ended process.” When asked about the Coalition’s participation in the Friends of Syria meeting scheduled for tomorrow, Safi said that this meeting aims to assess the commitment of the parties involved in the transitional process to put an end to the tyrannical rule of the Assad regime, and to gauge the commitment and the seriousness of the international community to bring about a political solution. We also seek to evaluate the positions of the countries that support the Syrian people and to probe the political attitudes.” Moreover, Safi echoed that the UN Secreteray General statement that the objective of the conference is the formation of a transitional ruling body with full powers. “The invitations sent by the UN purportedly conveys a very clear message, that the formation of this body is one of the top priorities of Geneva II. This is undoubtedly indicates that the approval of any country to attend the conference, including the Assad regime, means they agree to the formation of a transitional governing body with full powers.” Safi stresses that “opening humanitarian corridors, the release of detainees, lifting the siege on Syrian cities,” are among the demands that the Syrian Coalition is going to present during the meeting with Friends of Syria Group. Safi concluded his statement saying that “Iran cannot attend the conference if it does not withdraw their militias from Syria and acknowledge all the terms of Geneva I.”
(Source: Syrian Coalition / 12.01.2014)