Deir Yasin Massacre, 09.04.1948

By Reham Alhelsi
10 April, 2010
Since the arrival of the first Zionist to Palestine, hundreds of massacres have been committed against unarmed Palestinian civilians in the name of “Israel”, making this entity synonym to death and destruction. One of the worst Zionist massacres committed against Palestinians is the Deir Yasin massacre. Defenceless Palestinian civilians were tortured before being massacres and their bodies mutilated. Women and children were raped, babies were butchered and pregnant women were bayoneted. Deir Yassin, a Palestinian village located at the outskirts of Jerusalem, had a population of around 750 on the eve of 09.04.1948. The village was surrounded by 6 Zionist colonies, the closest being Giv’at Sha’ul, and the Zionist colonists had blocked the main access road connecting Deir Yasin with Jerusalem, placing Deir Yasin under an almost total blockade. To protect the village from the attacks of the Zionists, the villagers of Deir Yasin formed a local guard whose weaponry consisted only of a few old rifles and very little ammunition. Because the village was surrounded by several Zionists colonists, was besieged and continuously threatened by them and because the villagers had little means to protect themselves, Deir Yasin agreed to a non-aggression pact with the Zionist colonists just one month before the massacre. Nevertheless, on 09.04.1948, and in a joint operation coded “Operation Unity” the 3 terrorist gangs Irgun, Lehi (Stern) and Haganah (later Zionist terrorist army) attacked the peaceful village with the aim of killing as many Palestinians as possible and to force the rest out of their homes and lands. At 4:30 on Friday morning, 09.04.1948, and while the villagers slept, the Zionist terror gangs surrounded Deir Yasin. Palestinians woke up to the sound of loud speakers ordering them to leave the village, and the unsuspecting residents went out of their homes to investigate the situation, and it was then that the massacre began. The Irgun attacked the village from the south east, Stern attacked it from the east while the Haganah bombarded the village with mortars. The Palestinian village guard tried to protect the residents and to stop the Zionist gangs, they fought heroically but with their meagre weaponry had little chance against three fully armed terror gangs. The Zionists opened fire at whoever tried escaping the village, and then moved into the village and started their “clean up”: they moved from one house to the other raping women, slaughtering children and killing whoever was inside with machine guns and knives. Whole families were lined up against the wall and executed. Pregnant women were bayoneted and the bodies of children were mutilated. Money and jewellery were snatched from the bodies of victims and other personal belongings were stolen before houses were burnt. Of the 144 houses of Deir Yasin, at least 15 were blown up over the heads of their inhabitants by the Zionist terror gangs. British interrogating officer, Deputy Inspector General Richard Catling, confirmed that:
“The recording of statements is hampered also by the hysterical state of the women who often break down many times whilst the statement is being recorded. There is, however, no doubt that many sexual atrocities were committed by the attacking Jews. Many young schoolgirls were raped and later slaughtered. Old women were also molested. One story is current concerning a case in which a young girl was literally torn in two. Many infants were also butchered and killed. I also saw one old woman … who had been severely beaten about the head with rifle butts. Women had bracelets torn from their arms and rings from their fingers and parts of some of the women’s ears were severed in order to remove earrings.”[1]
During the massacre; men, women, children and elderly were killed in cold blood and in a gruesome way and hundreds were wounded. The number of victims is disputed. Most sources put the number of martyrs at 254, including 25 pregnant women who were bayoneted and 52 children who were maimed in front of their mothers before being beheaded and the mothers slain.
“A chilling account of the massacre is given by a Red Cross doctor who arrived at the village on the second day and saw himself – the mopping up – as one of the terrorists put it to him. He says that the “mopping up” had been done with machine guns, then grenades and finished off with knives. Women’s bellies were cut open and babies were butchered in the hands of their helpless mothers. Around 250 people were murdered in cold blood.[2] Of those 250 people, 25 pregnant women were bayoneted in their abdomens while still alive. 52 children were maimed under the eyes of their own mothers, and they were slain and their heads cut off. Their mothers were in turn massacred and their bodies mutilated. About 60 other women and girls were also killed and their bodies mutilated[3].
The UN and the Red Cross, whose representatives were among the first to enter the village after the massacre, confirm that the number of the victims is in fact close to the 250 estimate. Other more recent sources name around 120 martyrs (see list of Martyrs), adding that the number of victims was exaggerated by the Zionist terrorists to spread fear amongst Palestinians everywhere. Ethnic cleansing was one of the declared aims of the massacre, and the atrocities committed at Deir Yasin were used to force residents of other Palestinian villages to flee for their lives out of fear of a similar destiny. After the massacre, Zionist terrorist gangs went from one Palestinian village to another, ordering Palestinians to leave “or meet the fate of Dayr Yassin”[4]. They would warn the residents in loud speakers: “The Jericho road is still open, fly from Jerusalem before you are killed, like those in Deir Yassin.”[5] During the expulsion of the inhabitants of Ramleh and Lydd in July 1948, Sari Nair from Ramleh recalled how they were kicked out of their home by a Zionist soldier who told them to leave “Otherwise you know what will happen. What happen at Deir Yassin will happen to you.”[6]
In addition to those butchered in their homes, 25 Palestinian men were rounded up by the Zionist terrorists, loaded onto a truck and paraded through Jerusalem in a sort of “victory tour” before being executed at a nearby quarry and buried in a mass grave. Also, eye witnesses reported that around 150 women and children were paraded naked through the Jewish neighbourhoods of Jerusalem. “The marauders gathered the women and girls who were still alive, and after removing all their clothes, put them in open cars, driving them naked through the streets of the Jewish section of Jerusalem, where they were subjected to the mockery and insult of the onlookers. Many took photographs of those women”[7] 55 children who survived the massacre were left at the Mendelbaum gate. 6 of these orphans went knocking on the door of Palestinian Jerusalemite Hind Al-Husseini seeking shelter. After hearing about the massacre, Al-Husseini went searching for the other children and after finding them decided to take care of them all. Her family gave her the mansion of her grandfather Dar Al-Husseini (the Husseini house) where she was born and which she renamed into Dar Al-Tifl Al-Arabi (Home of the Arab Child). Hind Al-Husseini dedicated her whole life to the orphans of Deir Yasin and other Palestinian children.
Site of the mass grave of the victims of Deir Yasin massacre
When the news of the massacre spread, the International Red Cross Society requested permission for its representative Jaques Reynier to enter the village and investigate the matter. The Jewish Agency – which claimed it had nothing to do with the massacre and publicly “condemned” it – tried its best to prevent an investigation of the massacre and delayed granting the permission 24 hours to give the Zionist terrorists enough time to erase all traces of the massacred (something the Zionist government and its IOF have been doing since then after every massacre: public condemnation followed by a self-investigation that clears them of the massacre while preventing an independent investigation). But the evidence of the massacre was visible everywhere; it was so horrific that all efforts to erase it failed. The Zionists even tried to change the landmarks of the village so the Red Cross representative would not find the village’s cistern which they locked up. But Reynier found it and testified to finding the maimed bodies and parts of bodies of 150 women, children and elderly. Other bodies were found under the rabble of the destroyed homes, and many were scattered along the streets of the village. Scores of bodies were also found in the mass grave at the quarry. (below is the testimony given by Jaques Reynier)
Irgun, Lehi and Haganah Zionist terror gangs attacking Deir Yasin
As the massacre was taking place, both the British commander of the Mandate ground troops and the Jewish Agency knew about it but did nothing to stop it. But after the news of the massacre spread and the horrific details of what had happened were made public, both “denounced” the massacre and denied any previous knowledge. Also the Haganah, the armed forces of the Jewish Agency, “condemned” the massacre and denied any connection or knowledge of it. The leaders of the Haganah tried to hide their role in the massacre and claimed they only entered Deir Yasin after the massacre was over and denied the claims of Irgun and Lehi that they were part of the attack. These were enraged by the claims and published a letter proving that the Haganah commander was fully aware of the plan to attack Deir Yasin and even approved it. The leader of Irgun, Menachim Begin, “admitted on December 28, 1950, in a press interview in New York, that the Deir Yassin incident had been carried out in accordance with an agreement between the Irgun and the Jewish Agency and the Haganah”[8]. In fact, the attack on Deir Yasin was coded “Operation Unity” “to demonstrate the unity between the official Zionist leadership on the one hand and the two terrorist groups on the other”[9]. According to “Plan Dalet”, Deir Yasin was to be occupied together with other Palestinian villages. “Plan Dalet” was the master military plan of the Zionists and contained many sub-operations for the systematic expulsion of as many Palestinians as possible and grabbing as much Palestinian land as possible before the British Mandate was over. It gave Zionist military commanders and Zionist gangs a green light to massacre and to expel Palestinians and destroy their villages and towns. This Plan and its operations caused the ethnic cleansing of 213 Palestinian localities (40% of all Palestinian localities) and caused 413,794 Palestinians refugees (54% of the Nakba refugees) making it the main plan behind the ethnic cleansing of Palestine. It started on 01.04.1948 and ended on 15.5.1948 and consisted of 8 major military operations against Palestinian communities, the first being “Operation Nachshon”. This operation “was launched to carve out and hold a corridor from Tel Aviv on the coast to Jerusalem in the interior. This involved the occupation and destruction of Arab villages in this corridor. The massacre of Deir Yassin on April 10th was part of this operation. By April 12th, the Zionists had expelled about 15,000 Arab villagers from this corridor”[10]. Deir Yasin massacre was the first of at least another 17 massacres committed within the framework of “Plan Dalet”. Only two days after Deir Yassin, on 12.04.1948, Zionist terror units killed 12 residents of Khirbet Nasir Al-Din (Tiberias area). The next day, Irgun and Lehi Zionist terror gangs entered the village and killed 50 of its 90 residents, the remaining 40 managed to escape before the whole village was destroyed. “Plan Dalet” was carried out by the Zionist terrorists while Palestine was still under British Mandate, meaning under British protection, but the British army and government did nothing to stop the Zionist terror attacks and massacres against the Palestinians. Instead they supported the Zionist terrorists by providing them with weapons and military training. At the same time, they denied Palestinians the possession of weapons leaving most Palestinians defenceless.
During the massacre, Deir Yasin was ethnically cleansed, wiped off the Zionist map and later re-populated with Zionist colonists. While its indigenous population were made refugees who are till today scattered all over the world, Zionist colonists from Poland, Rumania and Slovakia were settled in the homes of the Palestinians. The irony is that some of the old houses of Deir Yasin became part of a Zionist mental hospital and these homes which are the site of the slaughter of their inhabitants later housed a number of Holocaust survivors suffering from mental trauma. The Zionist terror militias that committed the massacre were the Haganah, Irgun and Lehi. These terrorist gangs got most of their financing from the US, just like today, and in one case, the Lehi (Stern) terror gang contacted Albert Einstein and asked his help in raising money in the US. Einstein’s reply came one day after the massacre of Deir Yasin: he refused to help “calling the Stern Gang terrorists and misled criminals”[11]. The Haganah, as the armed unit of the Jewish Agency, was headed by the political leader of the Jewish Agency David Ben-Gurion who became the first prime minister of the Zionist entity. Irgun was headed by Menachim Begin who became the 6th prime minister of the Zionist entity. Lehi was headed by Yitzah Shamir who became the 7th prime minister of the Zionist entity. According to Menachim Begin: “The massacre was not only justified, but there would not have been a state of Israel without the victory at Deir Yassin.”[12] and after the massacre, he sent the attackers of Deir Yasin: “Accept congratulations on this splendid act of conquest. Tell the soldiers you have made history in Israel.” No one was ever punished for this and other massacres. This entity that had been headed by one war criminal after the other since its creation, and is still headed by war criminals, blatantly keeps claiming it seeks peace and is “only defending itself” when it kills unarmed civilians whether in Palestine, Lebanon or elsewhere. Deir Yasin was not an isolated incident. Hundreds of massacres followed and the Jenin massacre and the recent Gaza Genocide are only two examples of the blood-thirsty Zionist nature.
Choosing Deir Yasin as a target for this horrific massacre only shows the nature of the Zionist entity: Deir Yasin was known as a peaceful village and had prevented Palestinian fighters from using its land to fight the Zionist terrorists, in addition to the fact that it had signed a non-aggression treaty with the Zionists. One day before the massacre, the Palestinian leader Abdel-Qader Al-Husseini had been killed while resisting the Zionists in near-by Al-Qastal. He had waited in vain for support from Arab armies who had betrayed him and betrayed Palestine as they still do. Deir Yasin had refused to assist Al-Husseini and the Palestinian fighters. The village, surrounded by several Zionists colonies maybe saw in signing the non-aggression pact the only way to protect its inhabitants from the Zionist terror. Nevertheless, the Zionists chose Deir Yasin as the site for the massacre which was to be used as example for all other Palestinian villages and towns. The Zionists chose the people who signed a “non-aggression” treaty and as a “thank you” massacred them, raped their mothers and wives, paraded their children naked before executing them. This should always be a reminder and a warning for every Palestinian about the nature of Zionists, and a warning to all those who want to negotiate with Zionists or sign agreements with them claiming the “Zionists want peace”. There is no peace with this entity and there will never be peace as long as there is Zionism. There can be no peace with an entity that has ethnic cleansing as its official policy. “Yosef Weitz, the Jewish administrator responsible for Jewish colonization and member of the Jewish Agency’s first Transfer Committee declared as early as 1940 that: “Between ourselves it must be clear that there is no room for both peoples together in this country. We shall not achieve our goal of being an independent people with the Arabs in this small country .The only solution is a Palestine, at least Western Palestine (west of the Jordan river) without Arabs And there is no other way than to transfer the Arabs from here to the neighboring countries, to transfer all of them; not one village, not one tribe, should be left. Only after this transfer will the country be able to absorb the millions of our own brethren. There is no other way out.”[13] There can never be peace with an entity that thrives on continuous aggression, oppression, numerous massacres, the theft of Palestinian and the Judaization of Palestine.
Deir Yasin massacre is one of the most barbaric and horrific massacres committed by the ZioNazis and remains one of the many witnesses of Zionist barbarism and ZioNazi behaviour. But most importantly; Deir Yasin must always remain a warning and a reminder to every Palestinian, to every Arab as the village that signed a “peace agreement” with the Zionists and ended up being ethnically cleansed, wiped off the map and its residents either savagely massacred or made refugees.
Testimonies of Palestinian witnesses[14]:
Um Mahmud (born 1932): “We were inside the house. We heard shooting outside. My mother woke us up. We knew the Jews had attacked us. My cousin and his sister came running and said the Jews were already in our garden. In the meantime, fighting became heavier and we heard lots of gunshots outside. A bomb was thrown at us and it exploded close to where we were in the yard… My sister- in-law did not want to leave. She was frightened. The girl was two months old and the boy about three. I took the two and my mother said we should go to my uncle’s house. I saw how Hilweh Zeidan was killed, along with her husband, her son, her brother and Khumayyes. Hilweh Zeidan went out to collect the body of her husband. They shot her and she fell over his body… I also saw Hayat Bilbeissi, a nurse from Jerusalem serving in the village, as she was shot before the house door of Musa Hassan. The daughter of Abu El Abed was shot dead as she held her niece, a baby. The baby was shot too… Whomever tried to run away was shot dead.”
Abu Yousef (born 1927): “…After the battle, the Jews took elderly men and women and youths, including 4 of my cousins and a nephew. They took them all. Women who had on them gold and money, were stripped of their gold. After the Jews removed their dead and wounded, they took the men to the quarry and sprayed them all with bullets. …One woman had her son taken some 40 to 60 meters away from where she and the rest of the women stood by, and shot him dead. Then they brought Jewish kids to throw stones at his body. They later poured kerosene on his body and set it ablaze while the women watched from a distance. We later collected ourselves, & checked who was missing. At Jaffa Gate in Jerusalem, we were gathered by the Arab Supreme Committee. Each of us was looking for a son, a daughter, a sister or a mother. All men were busy fighting.”
Fahima Zeidan (born 1936): “The Jews ordered all our family to line up against the wall and they started shooting us. I was hit in the side, but most of us children were saved because we hid behind our parents. The bullets hit my sister Kadri (four) in the head, my sister Sameh (eight) in the cheek, my brother Mohammed (seven) in the chest. But all the others with us against the wall were killed: my father, my mother, my grandfather and my grandmother, my uncles and aunts and some of their children.”
Hanna Khalil (born 1932): “I saw a man took a kind of sword and slash my neighnor Jamila Habash from head to toe then do the same thing on the steps to my house to my cousin Fathi”
Safiyeh Attiyah (born 1907): describes how she was come upon by a man who suddenly opened up his trousers and pounced on her. “I began screaming and wailing. But the women around me were all meeting the same fate. After that they tore off our clothes so that they could fondle our breasts and our bodies with gestures too horrible to describe.” … “Some of the men were so anxious to get our earrings they ripped our ears to pull them off faster”
Mohammad Jaber: “The Jews broke in, drove everybody outside, put them against the wall and shot them. One of the women was carrying a three month old baby.”
Halima Eid (born 1918): describes what happened to her sister. “I saw a soldier grabbing my sister, Saliha al-Halabi, who was nine months pregnant. He pointed a machine gun at her neck, then emptied its contents into her body. Then he turned into a butcher, and grabbed a knife and ripped open her stomach to take out the slaughtered child with his iniquitous Nazi knife.”
Abu Hasan (was 22 at the time): “The Jews went from house to house and killed whoever was there. Most people fled to Ein Karem. The way out through Giv’at Shaul had already been blocked for a few months. The main attack came from the direction of Giv’at Shaul. The young men of Dayr Yasin were able initially to repulse it, and even damaged the Etzel’s two vehicles. The attackers even suffered casualties. Later the Jews attacked with greater force, entered the village and carried out a massacre.”
Muhammad Aref Sammour: testified before the British investigating officers that the Jewish gangs: “ripped open the bellies of all the women they found straight away with bayonets”. They also took jewelry from their victims and if those items did not come off easily: “they would cut off the arm to take the bracelet or cut the finger to get the ring.”

Abu Mahmud (born 1927): “I was in the village when the Jews attacked. I and my colleagues were on the western side of the village, opposite Al Qastal. We had our guns on us. All villagers, mainly the youths, were ready for whatever may happen after the Qastal battle was over. By 1630 on Thursday 8 April 1948, Abdul Qader Husseini was killed as we were watching the battle from a distance. After his death, we took precautionary measures in case anything would happen: We guarded the village until 0230 the next morning when the Jews started entering the village with the use of spot and search lights looking for our fighters. The Jews closed on the village amid exchanges of fire with us. Once they entered the village, fighting became very heavy in the eastern side and later it spread to other parts, to the quarry, to the village center until it reached the western edge. The battle was on three fronts, east, south and north. The Jews used all sorts of automatic weapons, tanks, missiles, cannons. They used to enter houses and kill women and children indiscriminately. The youths in the village fought bravely against them and the fighting continued until it was around 1530 afternoon. We had no aid or support from any party. They took about 40 prisoners from the village. But after the battle was over, they took them to the quarry where they shot them dead and threw their bodies in the quarry. After they removed their dead and wounded, they took the prisoners and killed them. They took the elderly prisoners, women and men and took them out of the village, yet they killed the youths. They called on us to surrender, to throw our weapons and to save ourselves. But we did not imagine them breaking into the village. We expected the fighting to last one or two hours, after which they would retreat. But they continued the fighting (..). We had trenches. The Jews filled one of those trenches with sand and rocks in order for their tanks to cross. When we hit the tank, it started firing from its machine-guns at our positions in the western edge of the village. (..). I remember, from what my uncle’s wife told me, that an uncle of mine, who was a schoolmaster, had killed the commander of the invading gangs on the staircase of one of the houses and later he disappeared for three days. Then, they found him with his mother, originally from Latakia in Syria, they saw him with her, his name was Ribhi Atiyyeh. She disguised him in women’s clothes to make sure that she could get him out of the village. They identified that he was a man, they opened fire and killed him. That is what I heard from my uncle’s wife, but I did not see it happening before my eyes.”
Statement of Jacques de Reynier, Chief representative of the International Committee of the Red Cross[15]
“On Saturday, April 10, in the afternoon, I received a telephone call from the Arabs begging me to go at once to Deir Yasin where the civilian population of the whole village has just been massacred.
“I learned that the Irgun extremists hold this sector, situated near Jerusalem. The Jewish Agency and the Haganah’s General Headquarters say that they know nothing about this matter and furthermore it is impossible for anyone to penetrate an Irgun area.
“They advise me that I not become involved in this matter as my mission will run the risk of being permanently cut short if I go there. Not only can they not help me but they also refuse all responsibility for what will certainly happen to me. I answer that I intend to go there at once, that the notorious Jewish Agency exercises its authority over the territory in Jewish hands and that the agency is responsible for my freedom of action within the bounds of my mission.
“In fact, I do not know at all how to do it. Without Jewish support it is impossible to reach that village. After thinking I suddenly remember that a Jewish nurse from a hospital here had made me take her telephone number, saying with a strange look that if I ever were in a difficult situation I could call her. On a chance I call her late in the evening and tell her the situation. She tells me to be in a predetermined location the following day at 7 o’clock and to take in my car the person who will be there
“The next day on the hour and in the location upon which we agreed, an individual in civilian clothes, but with pistols stuffed in his pockets, jumps into my car and tells me to drive without stopping. At my request, he agrees to show me the road to Deir Yasin, but he admits not being able to do to much more for me. We drive out of Jerusalem, leave the main road and the last regular army post and we turn in on a cross road. Very soon two soldiers stop us. They look alarming with machine guns in full view and larger cutlasses at the belt.
“I recognize the uniform of those I am looking for. I must leave the car and lend myself to bodily search. Then I understand that I am a prisoner. All seems lost when a very big fellow … jostles his friends, takes my hand … He understands neither English nor French, but in German we arrive at a perfect understanding. He tells me his joy at seeing an ICRC delegate, for having been a prisoner in a camp for Jews in Germany he owes his life to nothing else but our intervention and three reprieves. He says that I am more than a brother for him and that he will do anything I ask. … We go to Deir Yasin.
“Having reached a ridge 500 meters from the village which we see below, we must wait a long time for permission to go ahead. The shooting from the Arab side starts every time somebody tries to cross the road and the Commander of the Irgun detachment does not seem willing to relieve me. Finally he arrives, young, distinguished, perfectly correct, but his eyes have a strange, cruel, cold look. I explain my mission to him which has nothing in common with that of a judge or arbiter. I want to help the wounded and bring back the dead
“Moreover, the Jews have signed a pledge to respect the Geneva Convention and my mission is therefore an official one. This last statement provokes the anger of this officer who asks me to consider once and for all that here it is the Irgun who are in command and nobody else, not even the Jewish Agency with which they have nothing in common.
“My (guide) hearing the raised voices intervenes … Suddenly the officer tells me I can act as I see fit but on my own responsibility. He tells me the story of this village populated by about 400 Arabs, disarmed since always and living on good terms with the Jews who encircled them. According to him, the Irgun arrived 24 hours previously and ordered by loudspeaker the whole population to evacuate all the buildings and surrender. There is a 15 minute delay in the execution of the command. Some of the unhappy people came forward and would have been taken prisoners and then turned loose shortly afterwards toward the Arab lines. The rest did not obey the order and suffered the fate they deserved. But one must not exaggerate for there are only a few dead who would be buried as soon as the `clean up’ of the village is over. If I find a bodies, I can take them with me, but there are certainly no wounded
“This tale gives me cold chills. “I return to Jerusalem to find an ambulance and a truck that I had alerted through the Red Shield … I arrive with my convoy in the village and the Arab fire ceases. The (Jewish) troops are in campaign uniforms with helmets. All the young people and even the adolescents, men and women, are armed to their teeth: pistols, machine guns, grenades, and also big cutlasses, most of them still bloody, that they hold in their hands. A young girl with the eyes of a criminal, shows me hers still dripping. She carries it around like a trophy. This is the ‘clean up’ team which certainly has accomplished its job very conscientiously.
“I try to enter a building. About 10 soldiers surround me with machine guns aimed at me. An officer forbids me to move from the spot. They are going to bring the dead that are there, he says. I then get as furious as ever before in my life and tell these criminals what I think about the way they act, menacing them with the thunder I can muster, then I roughly push aside those who surround me and enter the building.
“The first room is dark, completely in disorder, and empty. In the second, I find among smashed furniture covers and all sorts of debris, some cold bodies. There they have been cleaned up by machine guns then by grenades. They have been finished by knives
“It is the same thing in the next room, but just as I am leaving, I hear something like a sigh. I search everywhere, move some bodies and finally find a small foot which is still warm. It is a little 10 year old girl, very injured by grenade, but still alive. I want to take her with me but the officer forbids it and blocks the door. I push him aside and leave with my precious cargo protected by the brave (guide).
“The loaded ambulances leaves with orders to return as soon as possible. And because these troops have not dared to attack me directly, it is possible to continue.
“I give orders to load the bodies from this house on the truck. Then I go on to the neighboring house and go on. Everywhere I encounter the same terrible sight. I only find two persons still alive, two women, one of whom is an old grandmother, hidden behind the firewood where she kept immobile for at least 24 hours.
“There were 400 persons in the village. About 50 had fled, three are still alive, but the rest have been massacred on orders, for as I have noticed, this troop is admirably disciplined and acts only on command.
De Reynier continues that he returns to Jerusalem where he confronts the Jewish Agency and scolds them for not exercising control over the 150 armed men and women responsible for the massacre
“I then go to see the Arabs. I say nothing about what I have seen, but only that after a first quick visit to the spot there seems to be several dead and I ask what I shall do or where to bring them … they ask me to see that a suitable burial be given them in a place which will be recognizable later on. I pledge to do so and on my return to Deir Yasin, I find the Irgun people in a very bad mood. They try to stop me from approaching the village and I understand when I see the number and above all the state of the bodies which have been lined up on the main street. I demand firmly that they proceed with the burial and insist on helping them. After some discussion, they begin actually to scoop out a big grave in a small garden. It is impossible to verify the identity of the dead, for they have no papers, but I wrote accurately their descriptions with approximate age.
“Two days later, the Irgun had disappeared from the spot and the Haganah had taken possession. We have discovered different places where the bodies have been piled up without either decency or respect in the open air.
“Back in my office I received two gentleman in civilian clothes, very well dressed who had waited for more than one hour. It is the commander of the Irgun detachment and his aide. They have prepared a text they ask me to sign. It is a statement according to which I have been received courteously by them, that I have obtained all the help needed to accomplish my mission and I thank them for the aide they gave me
“As I hesitate, I begin to discuss the statement, and they tell me that if I care for my life I should sign immediately.” Calling the statement contrary to fact, de Reynier refuses to sign. Several days later in Tel Aviv, de Reynier says he was approached by the same two men who asked the ICRC to assist some of their Irgun soldiers.
Zionist Statements[16]
“Former Haganah officer, Col. Meir Pa’el, upon his retirement from the Israeli army in 1972, made the following public statement about Deir Yasin that was published by Yediot Ahronot (April 4, 1972): “In the exchange that followed four [Irgun] men were killed and a dozen were wounded … by noon time the battle was over and the shooting had ceased. Although there was calm, the village had not yet surrendered. The Irgun and LEHI men came out of hiding and began to `clean’ the houses. They shot whoever they saw, women and children included, the commanders did not try to stop the massacre …. I pleaded with the commander to order his men to cease fire, but to no avail. In the meantime, 25 Arabs had been loaded on a truck and driven through Mahne Yehuda and Zichron Yousef (like prisoners in a Roman `March of Triumph’). At the end of the drive, they were taken to the quarry between Deir Yasin and Giv’at Shaul, and murdered in cold blood … The commanders also declined when asked to take their men and bury the 254 Arab bodies. This unpleasant task was performed by two Gadna units brought to the village from Jerusalem.”
Zvi Ankori, who commanded the Haganah unit that occupied Deir Yasin after the massacre, gave this statement in 1982 about the massacre, published by Davar on April 9, 1982: “I went into 6 to 7 houses. I saw cut off genitalia and women’s crushed stomaches. According to the shooting signs on the bodies, it was direct murder.”
Dov Joseph, one time Governor of the Israel sector of Jerusalem and later Minister of Justice, called the Deir Yassin massacre “deliberate and unprovoked attack.”
Arnold Toynbee described it as comparable to crimes committed against the Jews by Nazis.”
“According to Shai (Israeli Internal intelligence) commander Levy reported on April 12, 1948 that the occupation of Deir Yassin went as follows: “The occupation of the village was carried with great cruelty. Whole families… women, old people, children… were killed, and there were piles of dead [in various places]. Some of the prisoners moved to places of incarceration, including women and children, were murdered viciously by their captors.” “LHI [Stern Gang lead by Yitzhak Shamir] members tell of the barbaric behavior [Hitnahagut barbarit in Hebrew] of the IZL [Irgun gang lead by Menachim Begin] toward the prisoners and the dead. They also relate that the IZL men raped a number of [Palestinian] Arab girls and murdered them afterwards (we don’t know if this true).”The Shai operative who visited Deir Yassin hours after the massacre, Mordechai Gichen, reported on April 10, 1948: Their [i.e., the IZL?] commander says that the order was: to capture the adult males and to send the women and children to Motza. In the afternoon [of April 9, 1948], the order was changed and became kill all prisoners. . . . The adult males were taken to town in trucks and paraded in the city, then taken back to the [village] site and killed with rifle and machine-gun fire. Before they were put on the trucks, the IZL and LHI men searched the women, men, and Children [and] took from them all the jewelry and STOLE their money. The behavior toward them was especially barbaric [and included] kicks, shoves with rifle butts, spitting, and cursing (people from [the Western Jerusalem neighborhood of] Giv’at Shaul took part in the torture).”
Lest We Forget: Names of Deir Yasin Martyrs
1 Isma’il Shakir Mustafa (1 yr old)
2 Ahmad Hussein Omar ‘Atiyah (4 yrs old)
3 Isma’il Al-Haj Khalil (40 yrs old)
4 Ahmad Hussein Ahmad Jabir (45 yrs old)
5 As’ad Ridwan (75 yrs old)
6 Isma’il Atiyah (95 yrs old)
7 Amnah Hussein (80 yrs old)
8 Amnah Ali Mustafa
9 Amnah Al-Kobari
10 Basima As’ad Ridwan (25 yrs old)
11 Jabir Tawfiq Jabir Jaber (27 yrs old)
12 Jamil Issa Eid (30 yrs old)
13 Jabir Mustafa Jabir (75 yrs old)
14 Husniyyeh ‘Atiyah
15 Hilwa Zeidan (50 yrs old)
16 Hasan Ali Zeidan
17 Hassan Ya’coub Mohammad Ali Farhan
18 Hussein Ismail Mohammad Sammour
19 Khalil Mustafa Jabir (35 yrs old)
20 Khadra Al-Bituniyyah (60 yrs old)
21 Hayat Al-Balbisi
22 Samia Ali Mustafa (17 yrs old)
23 Salim Mohammad Ismail (25 yrs old)
24 Su’ad Ismail ‘Atiyah (21 yrs old)
25 Sa’id Mohammad Ismail ‘Atiyah (7 yrs old)
26 Samiha Ahmad Zahran (7 yrs old)
27 Sa’id Mohammad Sa’id (15 yrs old)
28 Samih Ahmad Zahran (9 yrs old)
29 Sammour Khalil Ismail (11 yrs old)
30 Said Musa Zahran
31 Shafiq Musa Mustafa
32 Shafiq Shakir Mustafa
33 Shafiqa Musa Mustafa
34 Subhiya Radwan (75 yrs old)
35 Safiyya Mohammad Eid Al-Sheikh (70 yrs old)
36 Salhia Mohammad Eid (20 yrs old)
37 Tharifa Mohammad Ali Khalil (16 yrs old)
38 Isa Ahmad Yousif (50 yrs old)
39 Abdel Rahman Hussein Hamid (52 yrs old)
40 ‘Ayish Khalil (70 yrs old)
41 Aziza Ali Mustafa (17 yrs old)
42 Abdallah Abdel Majid Sammour (23 yrs old)
43 Ali Hasan Ali Zeidan (30 yrs old)
44 Ali Mohammad Zahran
45 Ali Hussein Ali (35 yrs old)
46 Ali Al-Haj Khalil (30 yrs old)
47 ‘Aida Ali Mustafa Al-‘Amouri (40 yrs old)
48 ‘Awni Ismail ‘Atiyah (8 yrs old)
49 Ali Abdel Rahim Hamid (10 yrs old)
50 Isa Mohammad Eid (15 yrs old)
51 Omar Ahmad Zahran
52 ‘Imran Mohammad Ismail Atiyah
53 ‘Aziza Misleh
54 Ali Al-Khalili
55 Ali Hussein Hasan Misleh
56 Yusra Musa Mustafa
57 Yousif Ahmad Alia
58 Fatima Sammour (45 yrs old)
59 Fatima Mohammad Eid Al-Malhia (70 yrs old)
60 Fatima Jum’a Zahran (6 yrs old)
61 Fatima Ismail Atiya
62 Fathi Jum’a Zahran (2 yrs old)
63 Fouad Al-Sheikh Khalil (12 yrs old)
64 Faris Dweik (30 yrs old)
65 Faddiya Ismail Sammour
66 Fathiya Jum’a Zahran
67 Mahmoud Ali Mustafa (17 yrs old)
68 Mahmoud Mohammad Judeh (25 yrs old)
69 Mazien Ahmad Ridwan (5 yrs old)
70 Mustafa Ali Zeidan (9 yrs old)
71 Mohammad Al-Haj ‘Ayish (25 yrs old)
72 Mohammad Mahmoud Ismail Sammour (35 yrs old)
73 Mohammad Ali Khalil (25 yrs old)
74 Mohammad Ismail ‘Atiyah (50 yrs old)
75 Mohammad Mahmoud Zahran (14 yrs old)
76 Mohammad Musa Zahran (17 yrs old)
77 Mariam Mohammad Atiya (10 yrs old)
78 Musa Mohammad Ismail Atiya (13 yrs old)
79 Mohammad Mahmoud Ismail Atiya (15 yrs old)
80 Mustafa Mahmoud Mustafa Zeidan (11 yrs old)
81 Mohammad Hussein Mohammad ‘Atiyah (2 yrs old)
82 Mohammad Khalil Jabir (5 yrs old)
83 Mohammad Ali Mustafa (50 yrs old)
84 Mohammad Ali Misleh (55 yrs old)
85 Mohammad Jouden Hamdan (66 yrs old)
86 Mahmoud Mustafa Jabir (50 yrs old)
87 Mansour Abdel Aziz Sammour (27 yrs old)
88 Mohammad Ali Zahran
89 Mohammad Musa Mustafa
90 Maysar Musa Mustafa
91 Mohammad Said Jaber
92 Musa Ismail Sammour
93 Mohammad Ali Mustafa Zeidan
94 Nijma Ismail (100 yrs old)
95 Nathmi Ahmad Zahran (2 yrs old)
96 Ruqayya E’lian Ahmad Zahran (30 yrs old)
97 Ridwan As’ad Ridwan (14 yrs old)
98 Zeinab Jum’a Zahran (4 yrs old)
99 Zeinab Mohammad ‘Atiyah (15 yrs old)
100 Ribhi Mohammad Ismail ‘Atiyah (16 yrs old)
101 Rasmiya Musa Zahran
102 Zeinab Mohammad Musa Zahran
103 Tamam Mohammad Ali Hasan (17 yrs old)
104 Tawfiq Jabr (40 yrs old)
105 Watfa Abed Mohammad Ali Hasan
106 Sara Al-Kobariyya (40 yrs old)
107 Mohammad Zahran (65 yrs old)
108 ‘Aisha Ridwan
109 Khaldiyya ‘Eid
110 Jamila Hussein
111 Qadariyyah Zeidan (4 yrs old)
112 Zeidan, his wife, father and uncle

( / 10.04.2011)

Red Cross: Record number of Palestinians made homeless by Israeli demolitions

IRIN – The number of Palestinian homes in the West Bank and East Jerusalem demolished by Israeli authorities increased for the third consecutive month in March, according to the UN Relief and Works Agency (UNRWA).

Since January, Israeli authorities have demolished 176 Palestinian buildings, displacing 333 people, including 154 children. “The West Bank is where the future Palestinian state is meant to be situated, and its viability is being reduced with each demolition,” UNRWA spokesperson in Jerusalem Chris Gunness said.

In March, 77 buildings were demolished compared with 29 in January and 70 in February.

Half of the demolished structures were houses, while the rest included stables, which can be just as valuable to a herding community as a house, Gunness said.

The number of Palestinians made homeless by these demolitions also hit a record monthly high, according to UNRWA, with 158 affected in March (including 64 children) compared to 70 in January and 105 in February.

But Capt Amir Koren, spokesperson for the Israeli Civil Administration in Judea and Samaria (West Bank), told IRIN the structures were illegal.

“The Civil Administration is responsible for enforcing laws regarding planning and building in Judea and Samaria… As such, illegal structures built by both Israelis and Palestinians are dismantled as a matter of course, according to a set of priorities which have been brought before the High Court of Justice dozens of times in the past.

“During the first two months of 2011, the Civil Administration carried out 69 orders to dismantle illegal structures built in Area C by Palestinian residents.”

( / 10.04.2011)

Arabische Liga wil vliegverbod voor Gaza

De Arabische Liga gaat de Veiligheidsraad van de Verenigde Naties vragen een vliegverbod boven de Gazastrook af te kondigen. Dat heeft secretaris-generaal Amr Moussa van de Arabische Liga zondag gezegd.

De Arabische Liga was zondag in spoedzitting bijeengekomen om te praten over het geweld in de Gazastrook. Sinds donderdag zijn in de Gazastrook zeker achttien Palestijnen gedood door Israëlische aanvallen. Onder de slachtoffers waren niet alleen militanten, maar ook burgers, onder wie een 11-jarige jongen. De aanvallen zijn een reactie op een raketaanval donderdag op een Israëlische schoolbus waarbij een tiener en de bestuurder gewond raakten. De militante Palestijnse beweging Hamas heeft laten weten dat die aanslag een vergissing was en dat het niet de bedoeling was kinderen te treffen.

( / 10.04.2011)

Betogers in Egypte weigeren te vertrekken

Ruim duizend mensen hebben zondag voor de derde opeenvolgende dag op het Tahrirplein in de Egyptische hoofdstad Caïro betoogd tegen de militaire raad, die het land sinds de val van president Hosni Mubarak tijdelijk bestuurt. De demonstranten negeerden een oproep van het leger om van het Tahrirplein te vertrekken.

De actievoerders willen dat de militaire raad snel plaatsmaakt voor een burgerbewind en dat corrupte bestuurders harder worden aanpakt. Ze riepen leuzen tegen veldmaarschalk Hussein Tantawi, die de leiding over de militaire raad heeft.

Vrijdag en zaterdag was op het Tahrirplein ook al tegen de militaire raad betoogd. In de nacht van vrijdag op zaterdag kwam het tot botsingen tussen demonstranten en veiligheidstroepen. Daarbij zijn volgens medici een of twee doden gevallen en dertien mensen gewond geraakt. Onder de gewonden zijn ook militairen.

( / 10.04.2011)

The Repercussions of a UN Recognition of Palestine

The Palestinian Authority (PA) has been hard at work of late lining up votes in the UNGA for the recognition of the state of Palestine with pre ’67 borders with the eastern part of Jerusalem as its capital.  They intend to use the “Uniting for Peace” procedure to avoid a possible UNSC veto regardless of whether the procedure is legal. (See; The UN Charter Cannot Support GA Resolution 377). Were they to get such recognition the repercussions would be significant.

Alan Baker, who was legal counsel for Israel in the drafting of the Oslo Accords and is currently associated with the Jerusalem Center of Public Affairs, recently published The Palestinian UN Gamble — Irresponsible and Ill-Advised. He summarized his article as follows
“While such a resolution would not have the authority to alter the legal status of the territories, the negative consequences of such a course of action would nevertheless serve to void the very basis of the peace process. It would undermine the legal existence of the Palestinian Authority and violate commitments by Yasser Arafat to settle all issues by negotiation.

“Such unilateral action outside the negotiation process would constitute a fundamental breach of the 1995 Israeli-Palestinian Interim Agreement, thereby releasing Israel from its reciprocal commitments.”

This would go so far as to release Israel from the confines of UNSC Res 242. How so?

According to the Palestine Mandate passed in 1922, Great Britain, the Mandatory power, had the following obligation with respect to all of that part of Palestine lying west of the Jordan River:
“The Administration of Palestine, while ensuring that the rights and position of other sections of the population are not prejudiced, shall facilitate Jewish immigration under suitable conditions and shall encourage, in co-operation with the Jewish agency referred to in Article 4, close settlement by Jews, on the land, including State lands and waste lands not required for public purposes.”
The Plan of Partition (Res 181) passed by the UNGA in 1947, though it violated this provision, was accepted by the Jews and paved the way for the recognition of the state of Israel six months later.  Had the Arabs accepted this resolution, they too would have had a state and that would have been the end to Jewish rights of close settlement in Judea and Samaria (West Bank). But they didn’t and so Jewish rights to same didn’t end.
So why isn’t The Government of Israel asserting those rights now?
The answer finds its origin in UNSC Res 242, passed in 1967, which authorized Israel to remain in occupation until she had secure and recognized borders. Israel’s acceptance of this resolution effectively waived Jewish Mandate rights in exchange for such borders. Israel obviously preferred such borders over exercising her rights of “close settlement” which would have necessitated managing the Arab population in these lands. Once again the Arabs rejected this resolution, preferring instead “no negotiation, no recognition and no peace” as resolved in their Khartoum Conference in Sept 1967.
Notwithstanding this, Egypt broke ranks and made peace with Israel in 1979, as did Jordan in 1994.
In 1993 Rabin and Arafat signed the Declaration of Principles on the White House lawn, which aimed to
“establish a Palestinian Interim Self-Government Authority, the elected Council (the ‘Council’), for the Palestinian people in the West Bank and the Gaza Strip, for a transitional period not exceeding five years, leading to a permanent settlement based on Security Council Resolutions 242 and 338.”
As a pre-condition to this mutual declaration, Arafat delivered two letters to Rabin promising to amend the Charter of the PLO which called for the destruction of Israel, and Rabin delivered a letter to Arafat confirming his intention to allow normalization of life in the territories.  Arafat and the PLO never did amend their Charter.  For that matter, Fatah and Hamas have similar provisions in their Charters even to this day.
This Declaration made no mention of a Palestinian state as the goal, nor did it call for a cessation of Israeli settlement activity.
In 1995, Israel and the PA entered into an Interim Agreement which provided, inter alia, for the creation of the PA and for its exercise of power.  It obligated both parties “to carry out confidence building measures as detailed herewith.”  Those details involved Israel releasing prisoners in stages. No other confidence building measures were required.  That never stopped the US from continually demanding that Israel offer more “confidence building measures”.
Article XXXI provided:
“Nothing in this Agreement shall prejudice or preempt the outcome of the negotiations on the permanent status to be conducted pursuant to the DOP. Neither Party shall be deemed, by virtue of having entered into this Agreement, to have renounced or waived any of its existing rights, claims or positions.
“Neither side shall initiate or take any step that will change the status of the West Bank and the Gaza Strip pending the outcome of the permanent status negotiations.”
Both of these agreements became known as the Oslo Accords.
As Baker points out,  declaration of a state by the PA would clearly be a fundamental breach of this provision. To my mind there have been numerous fundamental breaches by the PA, which include their daily incitement, their Intifadas and their massive rocket attacks from Gaza.  In these instances over the years, Israel chose not to declare the Oslo Accords null and void. But not this time. For example, Israel has mooted the idea of annexing part, if not all, of Judea and Samaria (West Bank), were it to happen.
It may be argued that if the Agreement is abrogated that Israel’s Mandate rights still apply.
By demanding the armistice lines as borders subject to mutual exchanges, the PA is rejecting  Res 242 which provides for “secure borders” otherwise described as “defensible borders.”   Likewise the Arab League has similarly rejected Res 242 in putting forth their initiative, which was based on the armistice lines rather than “secure borders.”  By demanding 100% of Judea and Samaria, they are demanding that Israel retreat from all of the territories which is also contrary to the intent and meaning of the resolution.
Thus it would appear that not only will the Oslo Accords be no longer binding on Israel, neither will Res 242, because the Arabs have never accepted it.
The Obama Administration understands the risks of the UN granting recognition to the state of Palestine.   Dennis Ross, speaking to the ADL recently on behalf of the US said,
“We have consistently made it clear that the way to produce a Palestinian state is through negotiations, not through unilateral declarations, not through going to the UN.  Our position on that has been consistent in opposition.”
The Obama Administration would rather keep Israel shackled to the Oslo Accords while at the same time pressuring Israel to capitulate.  In reality, the US has abandoned Res 242 and the Oslo Accords, de facto, by pressing Israel to accept security guarantees in place of secure borders and by pushing the Arab League Initiative. She is also pushing for the division of Jerusalem, which is not required by the Oslo Accords.
It remains to be seen if the EU will follow the US lead on keeping Israel shackled.  Angela Merkel during her recent meeting with PM Netanyahu said, “We are in favor of two states for two nations.  It is not certain that unilateral recognition will contribute to promoting peace, and this will be our position in September.”
Regardless, the PA seems bent on following through with bid for UN membership. Some people think the recognition of the state of Palestine would be a disaster for Israel while others think not.
Caroline Glick recently wrote,
“The fact is that while acceptance of “Palestine” as a UN member state will be a blow, it will mark an escalation not a qualitative departure from the basic challenges we have been facing for years.”
But at least, Israel will be free to act.
Israel will have no legal obligation to refrain from annexing Judea and Samaria in whole or in part. Her right to settle all of this land and to establish a national home on all of it for the Jews, which has been recognized by international law, will be legally unassailable.  Furthermore, as conquerors of this land, pursuant to a defensive war, international law entitles her to keep it. When Israel conquered the land, no one had sovereignty over it including Jordan and the Arabs living there.  In effect, this war was a continuation of the ‘48 war. Thus it put an end to the Armistice Agreement and the armistice lines which the parties had agreed would not be the final borders in any event.
After coming this far in my reasoning, I had a conversation with Baker because I wanted him to reconcile for me the provision in the Interim Agreement calling for a settlement based on Res 242 and Article XXXI which provides “Neither Party shall be deemed, by virtue of having entered into this Agreement, to have renounced or waived any of its existing rights, claims or positions.” In my reading of these two clauses, I thought that the second was limited by the first.
He advised to the contrary, noting that Israel could assert any right she might have. I asked if that included our right to settle the land pursuant to the Mandate.  He advised that the Mandate rights ended in the creation of Israel in 1948. I begged to differ, arguing that that would have been the case had the Arabs accepted a state on the rest at that time.  But what do I know?  He has been involved in this process for close to 20 years.
He did say that even if a state is declared, the PA will still have to negotiate borders and everything else, so he isn’t fearful of such recognition.  With this, I agreed. But the chances of reaching agreement after 25 years, are slim. A recent poll reported that 78% of Likudniks oppose the creation of a Palestinian state.
In the meantime, Israel should build as much as she wants and should extend Israeli law to all communities in Judea and Samaria in which her citizens live.   Aside from providing housing for its citizens, it would put pressure on the Palestinians to compromise.  If Israel were to continue with the de facto freeze, the Palestinians would have no incentive to make peace and could wait a hundred years while they build throughout Judea and Samaria and continue their campaign to demonize and delegitimize Israel.
Accordingly, Israel should welcome the recognition of a Palestinian state and the abrogation of the Oslo Accords.
Ted Belman is the editor of Israpundit and a retired lawyer.  He made aliya two years ago and lives in Jerusalem.

( / 10.04.2011)

Islamic Center Rules and Working Together

Our community Islamic centers and mosques are huge blessing in our lives. Unfortunately in recent years, due to our human nature, we have seen mismanagement, an inability to communicate and understand each other, and – the most damaging – a decline in youth involvement.

Having been a part of a community center for all the 24 years of my life, I have seen a lot. More importantly, as I got older I have seen the mismanagement which drives younger generations away from getting involved, rather than helping to add more building blocks to our centers.

Yes, it is professional for an organization to have regulation and procedures, but that does not mean they cannot be changed or even excused at times. Many of our Islamic centers are run by a “board of directors” or an “executive committee”. I’m all for organization and professionalism – but even those things have their limits because they begin to be unnatural when taken to an extreme.

When we look at today’s Islamic centers, we see cliques, unfriendliness, and the worst of dirty politics. Even though we call them comm-unity centers, we see a huge lack of the heart of the word. Our centers are full of committees and rules, protocol and paperwork. It leads one to wonder sometimes: was it always this hard to have a good, friendly group of Muslims get together and do good things for the world? Do we ever wonder how the Holy Prophet (peace be upon him and his progeny) and the Imams (peace be upon them) gathered ideas? How did they plan things out? How did they execute activities, or programs, or lectures for their fellow people?

Did they sit behind closed doors holding meetings in privacy, discussing what kinds of things to do for the “common, unelected, people of the community” without having the people there to help decide what was best for them?

Did they hold “open house meetings” in which they allowed questions from their fellow Muslim brothers and sisters only if the questions were written down, so that only questions which were “appropriate” in the committee’s view could be addressed aloud?

Our community was blessed in Muharram with the presence of Sayyid Abbas Ayleya from Seattle, Washington, where he helps to guide and teach his community. I asked him a question regarding board member/committee member elections in Islamic centers. I asked whether Islamic center elections were the only just or fair way to “select” those who will eventually be deciding what programs are offered to our families, who addresses gatherings in our centers – duties which pretty much may mean for some, indoctrinating our children with certain values and ideas. I added that if these “elections” which our communities think are so fair actually lead to very dirty politics and behind-the-scenes fixing, is it really the only way? The respected scholar proceeded to answer that actually, our Holy Prophet used to very simply handpick those whom he believed could get the job done right – no elections necessary.

That goes back to my point. Sometimes we make things so complicated that we don’t allow the beautiful logic, the Aql, and the human nature, that Allah has blessed us with, to do its work. Let’s imagine: if we were a community who were all aware of Br. Mohammad’s exceptional ability in event management due to his success in his career, would it be out of this world to allow Br. Mohammad to be the “lead”, and to even encourage him to take charge in helping to organize and plan programs for the community? Would it be illogical to ask Sr. Fatima to help in the finances of the center, seeing that she is has been working for a great company for 15 years, doing the treasury work? It kind of makes sense, right? It is human nature to be able to select, due to the abilities a person carries, someone to get the task done. Unfortunately we have gotten caught up in processes and referendums, and so much red tape and technicalities that we have forgotten the natural, human qualities that Allah has blessed us with. Sometimes we stop people from pitching in a helping hand by imposing rules that were not really necessary a mere 20 years ago – we limit the opportunities for volunteering by replacing our volunteers with paid positions.

When in a group, or a community, or a club, there are always the natural leaders who exhibit characteristics necessary to get the job done. Of course this all comes along with the qualities of trust, respect, honor, and honesty. With a little trust in our brothers and sisters, and most importantly with sincerity and Tawakkul, trust in God, we can begin to see the blessings of brotherhood and flourishing communities doing wonderful Islamic work like never before.

(Madiha Zaidi 10.04.2011)

Israël: aanvallen stoppen wanneer Palestijnen ook stoppen

Israëlische soldaten die raketschild Iron Dome bedienen, zoeken dekking tijdens een sirenealarm in Ashkelon. Foto Reuters / Amir Cohen Israëlische soldaten die raketschild Iron Dome bedienen, zoeken dekking tijdens een luchtalarm nabij Ashkelon.

Israël stopt zijn aanvallen, als de militanten in het door Hamas beheerde Gaza dat ook doen. Dat zei de Israëlische minister van defensie Ehud Barak vandaag op de radio. Vanochtend hebben Palestijnse militanten vanaf de Gazastrook drie mortieren op het zuiden van Israël afgeschoten.

Bij de aanval vielen geen gewonden. Door de motieraanval werd de elektriciteitstoevoer afgesneden.

Hamas zegt ook bereid te zijn tot een staakt het vuren, in reactie op de uitspraken van Barak.

“De Palestijnse facties zijn niet geïnteresseerd in escalatie”, zei Hamas-woordvoerder Sami Abu Zuhri tegen persbureau Reuters. “Als de Israëlische agressie stopt, kan de rust worden hersteld.”

Beide partijen hebben er geen belang bij om de situatie volledig uit de hand te laten lopen. Een soortgelijke geweldscyclus resulteerde eind 2008 in de Gazaoorlog. De angst bestaat dat een nieuwe oorlog uitbreekt door een enkel incident. De afgelopen maand is een gespannen situatie ontstaan.

Het geweld nam behoorlijk toe toen een Palestijnse raket donderdag een Israëlische schoolbus raakte, waardoor twee gewonden vielen. De afgelopen 48 uur hebben de Palestijnen volgens het Israëlische leger honderdtwintig raketten en mortieren op Israël afgevuurd. Volgens de Palestijnen zijn sinds donderdag bij Israëlische vergeldingsacties zeker negentien bewoners van de Gazastrook omgekomen.

Een van de slachtoffers was volgens Israël betrokken bij het ontvoeren van een Israëlische soldaat. Die wordt al vijf jaar vastgehouden in de Gazastrook.

( / 10.04.2011)

PVV: meeste Afghaanse meisjes terug

Vriendinnen van Sahar willen graag dat ze blijft
Vriendinnen van Sahar willen graag dat ze blijft

De PVV gaat ervan uit dat de meeste Afghaanse meisjes die hier al jaren zonder verblijfsvergunning wonen, naar Afghanistan worden teruggestuurd. Op die voorwaarde is de PVV akkoord gegaan met de verblijfsvergunning voor Sahar.

Minister Leers besloot gisteren dat de 14-jarige Sahar mag blijven omdat ze zo verwesterd is. Leers zei vorige maand dat er 400 soortgelijke gevallen zijn, maar volgens de PVV is afgesproken dat hooguit enkele tientallen van hen een verblijfsvergunning krijgen.

De partij hecht eraan dat per meisje wordt bekeken in hoeverre ze verwesterd is en of ze in Afghanistan veilig is.

( / 10.04.2011)

Islamic-Relief Nederland BENEFIET”WATER & WEES” met o.a. MAHER ZAIN

zondag 29 mei · 16:00 – 22:00


Mekongweg 5
1043 AE AMASTERDAM, Nederland

Gemaakt door:

Meer informatie
Islamic Relief wil jullie van harte welkom heten voor het benefiet Water & Wees op zondag 29 mei in the Sand in Amsterdam. Zo beloven we voor ieder wat wils: Anasheed, Comedy, Sprekers, Food, Kinder-activiteiten

verzorgd door: Yehia, Ramzi zerqane, Abdelhakim, en nog vele andere en als headliner niemand minder dan MAHER ZAIN.

Neem je familie en vrienden mee en maak er een gezellige dag van!

Reserveer nu uw entreekaarten, want vol is vol.

Voor meer info en/of reserveringen kunt u mailen naar of bel naar +32 (0) 20 616 00 22

See you there!