Palestine becomes member of IMF body

RAMALLAH (Ma’an) — Palestinian Authority Prime Minister Salam Fayyad announced Monday that Palestine has joined an IMF initiative to disseminate statistics to the public.

Palestine became a member of the Special Data Dissemination Standard, or SDDS, on April 19, becoming the fifth Arab state to join after Egypt, Morocco, Tunisia and Jordan.

SDDS is a standard by the International Monetary Fund to guide countries in the dissemination of national statistics to the public.

Palestine’s membership, listed as the West Bank and Gaza, indicates the maturity of PA institutions, Fayyad said.

A total of 70 other countries are members of the SDDS.

Fayyad thanked the national committee for its work in achieving such an accomplishment.

The team which worked on the project was led by the Palestinian Central Bureau of Statistics and assisted by the PA ministry of finance, the Palestinian Monetary Fund and the Palestinian Stock Exchange.

( / 23.04.2012)

Turkey gets first nudist beach

Nudist tourists will be able to work on their full-body tan on the sun-kissed Turkish coast from next week, when the mainly Muslim country opens its first naturist hotel, a report said Sunday.

Open exclusively to foreigners, the beachfront nudist-only hotel opens on May 1 near the major southwestern resort of Marmaris, a small revolution in Turkey’s conservative society, Milliyet newspaper reported.

“Nudism is allowed inside the hotel premises, but not on the nearby public beaches,” Ahmet Cosar, bookings manager at the Adaburnu-Golmar hotel, told the newspaper.

For guests who are determined to shun bathing suits, the hotel will provide a shuttle bus to and from a private naturist beach.

( / 23.04.2012)

THREAT Bilal Diab


Bilal Nabil Saeed Diab

Date of Birth: 4 February 1985

Place of residence: Kufr Ra’i, Jenin
Occupation: Barber
Date of arrest: 17 August 2011
Place of detention: Ramleh prison medical center
Number of administrative detention orders: 2
Expected end of current detention order: 14 August 2012
On 19 April 2012, Bilal Diab entered his 51st day of hunger strike in protest of his administrative detention. His health is rapidly deteriorating and he is refusing to stop his hunger strike until he is released.
Bilal Diab was arrested on 17 August 2011, when Israeli Occupying Forces (IOF) came to his home in the village of Kufr Ra’i, near Jenin, at 12:30 am. The family and a large group of friends and neighbors were sitting in the front yard, spending time together late into the night for Ramadan, when approximately 40 masked men, wearing civilian clothes, surrounded the house and entered the yard by climbing the walls of the neighbors’ houses. Bilal, along with four others, were sitting on the roof. After about 10 minutes, Israeli military jeeps arrived, accompanied by an intelligence officer.
The IOF began to throw sound bombs and shoot teargas into the yard, and then forced everyone to stand against the wall. Some of Bilal’s family members and friends were taken to a nearby store, where they were held until the arrest process was over. The rest of the group was kept in the front yard. Bilal’s brother, Issam, was thrown violently to the ground. His hands were shackled behind his back and then two soldiers stepped on his head.
Bilal and four of his friends were questioned for about 15 minutes. His four friends were then released, but Bilal was shackled, blindfolded and thrown to the ground. He was then dragged across the ground for 250 meters until reaching the military jeep. Bilal was taken to Megiddo prison, and then transferred to Salem Detention Center for interrogation.
Bilal was issued an administrative detention order for 6 months on 25 August 2011. As with all other administrative detainees, Bilal’s detention is based on secret information collected by Israeli authorities and available to the military judge but not to Bilal or his lawyer. This practice violates international humanitarian law, which permits some limited use of administrative detention in emergency situations, but requires that the authorities follow basic rules for detention, including a fair hearing at which the detainee can challenge the reasons for his or her detention. These minimum rules of due process have been clearly violated in Bilal’s case, leaving him without any legitimate means to defend himself.
Bilal’s administrative detention order was renewed for another six months on 14 February 2012. Bilal began an open hunger strike in protest of his administrative detention on 29 February. When he started his hunger strike, he was in Al-Naqab prison. On 21 March, he was transferred with another hunger striking prisoner, Thaer Halahleh, to Ramleh prison medical center. They are both currently being held in isolated cells, in the same section as prisoners with criminal offenses. Physicians for Human Rights-Israel (PHR-Israel) noted that “after losing consciousness a number of times, Mr. Diab was hospitalized twice at Assaf Harofeh Hospital, but was subsequently returned to [Ramleh prison medical center].” Bilal’s lawyer, Jamil al-Khatib, expressed concerned about his health condition. Bilal had also undergone a 14-day hunger strike in the previous month in solidarity with Khader Adnan.
Addameer lawyers have been denied access to Bilal and Thaer since they were transferred to Ramleh prison medical center. The Israeli Prison Service (IPS) claims that Bilal is receiving appropriate treatment and that he cannot be visited. These claims are contrary to evidence provided by Bilal through his lawyer and family that he is enduring difficult conditions in an isolated cell. Following repeated requests to the IPS and an urgent appeal submitted to the District Court on 1 April demanding access, a PHR-Israel independent doctor visited Bilal and Thaer on 9 April. Bilal had been refusing to drink water for two days, demanding to be transferred to a civilian hospital. The International Committee of the Red Cross communicated to his family on 12 April, however, that even though he had not been transferred to a hospital, he had started drinking water again, including vitamins and salts.
Bilal had a hearing in the appeal of his administrative detention order on 4 April, which he attended in a wheelchair. At the time, the decision on his appeal was postponed repeatedly for two weeks. On 18 April, the Israeli military judge announced this his final decision will come on 22 April.
Bilal previously spent seven years in Israeli prison. He was first arrested with his brother Bassam on 2 October 2003, when he was 18 years old, and served a seven-year sentence, before being released on 17 February 2010. He was not permitted to see his brother during this period, though they were both in prison.
Bilal and his family have been consistently targeted for arrest by Israeli authorities. Bilal’s family consists of his mother, who is 65 years old and suffers from diabetes and other ailments, two sisters and ten brothers, most of whom have been arrested at least once.
According to his family, their home was raided by the IOF more than 18 times throughout the Second Intifada; each time, at least one family member was arrested. In addition to being arrested in 2003 along with Bilal, Bilal’s brother Bassam was also arrested in February 2010 and sentenced to seven months in prison. Bilal’s brother Issam was arrested in 2006 and spent 10 months in administrative detention before being sentenced to 16 months in prison. Allam was held for six months in administrative detention in 2003, while Hammam was arrested in both 1993 and 1998 and spent 14 months in prison each time. Azzam, who is 34 years old, was arrested in 2001 and given a life sentence. He is currently in Ashkelon prison. On 29 March, he went on hunger strike in solidarity with Bilal.
Bilal’s mother applied for permission to visit her son through the International Committee of the Red Cross, but was denied for “security reasons.” Bilal has had no family visits since the day he was arrested. His family is calling on the international and local communities to start acting now on behalf of Bilal, as “he is facing death.” They also demand the end to administrative detention.
( / 23.04.2012)

Small demonstration in Turkey and the Mossad

My dear friend Karim  is arrested in Turkey when he was in demonstration with an other activist before the ambassy of Israel on the 17th of April.
The police of Turkey came and ask for the passports and the names. When they saw that they are pro Palestine, the policy gave the names to the secret police, the Mossad.
Also Palestine people or people who are fighting for the freedom of Palestine in Turkey are not safe for the Mossad. Be aware.


(for the safety of my friend, i have changed his name and his place of living).

Geslaagde boycot demonstratie

Zaterdagavond 21 april jl. heeft een groep mensenrechtenactivisten gedemonstreerd voor de Stadsschouwburg in Utrecht ter gelegenheid van het optreden van een dansgroep uit Israël. De demonstratie was gericht tegen het apartheidsbeleid van de Israëlische regering jegens de Palestijnen. Kunst en cultuur wordt door Israël gebruikt om het besmette imago van Israël als bezetter en schender van mensenrechten schoon te wassen, waardoor Israël cultuurinstellingen medeplichtig maakt aan haar apartheidsregime. Deze vorm van Israëlische kunstpromotie, die ten doel heeft een mooi imago te vestigen en de aandacht af te leiden van Israëls oorlogsmisdaden jegens de Palestijnen , heet de “Merk Israël” campagne.

De activisten demonstreerden met liederen, spandoeken  en een act tegen de apartheidsstaat Israël.

Door middel van flyers werd informatie uitgedeeld aan de schouwburgbezoekers. Soms volgde er een gesprek, een enkele keer brachten mensen hun kaarten terug naar de kassa en besloten maar liever een andere voorstelling te kiezen . In de flyertekst wordt gewezen op Israëlische kunstpromotie van staatswege met het vooropgezette doel de harde werkelijkheid in Israël te verdoezelen, zoals

-de voortdurende bezetting van Palestijns grondgebied,

-uitbreiding van illegale onderzettingen,

-de verstikkende blokkade van Gaza,

-invoering van twintig discriminerende wetten tegen Palestijnse staatburgers van Israël.

Ook wordt uitleg gegeven over noodzaak van een culturele boycot  jegens Israël . “Wij zijn niet perse gekant tegen Israëlische kunst of tegen Israëlische artiesten”,  geven de actievoerders aan, “maar we zijn er op tegen dat het Israëlische Ministerie van Buitenlandse zaken een mooier imago van Israël in de wereld wil plaatsen via kunst en cultuur ,terwijl Israël ondertussen gewoon doorgaat met het onderdrukken van Palestijnen en zich niets aantrekt van internationaal afgesproken wetten”.

De actiegroep  roept de dansers van Batsheva op om afstand te nemen van de “Merk Israël” campagne en het apartheidsbeleid van hun regering af te wijzen. De folder eindigt met een oproep aan alle culturele instellingen en de gemeente om geen podium meer te bieden aan Israëlische gezelschappen die gesponsord worden door de Israëlische overheid in het kader van de ‘Brand Israël’ campagne.

Deze demonstratie is geslaagd te noemen en zal een vervolg krijgen bij andere Israëlische optredens in Utrecht of Nederlandse steden.


Egypt’s Moussa warns over presidential ‘experiment’

Egyptian presidential candidate Amr Moussa said Egypt should not get into an experiment that has not been tried before. (Reuters)

Egyptian presidential candidate Amr Moussa said Egypt should not get into an experiment that has not been tried before.

Leading presidential candidate Amr Moussa said on Sunday he had better credentials than his mostly Islamist main rivals, and warned against plunging Egypt into an “experiment” with next month’s election.

Moussa, a popular former Arab League chief who also served as foreign minister under deposed president Hosni Mubarak, said he had the background to lead the country out of its “crisis.”

His main rivals in the May 23 and May 24 election include Mohammed Mursi, the head of the powerful Muslim Brotherhood’s political arm which dominates parliament, and Abdel Moneim Abol Fotouh, a moderate Islamist.

Asked in a news conference about the differences between him and his Islamist rivals, Moussa replied: “I believe it is a religious background, that’s right, and for me it is a nationalist background.”

“I believe that Egypt has been injured and Egypt has been mismanaged, and Egypt should not get into an experiment that has not been tried before in order for us to enter into a period of confusion.

“I want to do something for Egypt coming from all angles of thinking and of policy making, not a certain one that you should not go beyond,” he added.

The military, which took charge of the country after an uprising ousted president Hosni Mubarak in February 2011, has said it would hand power to the elected president by the end of June.

The generals’ critics, including the Muslim Brotherhood, say they want to cling to power even after the transition, through a pliant government.

Moussa, who refused to criticize the military when asked about human rights violations during crackdowns on protests, said the military would answer to him if elected.

“The president will be the boss, the president will be the one who directs and leads the country,” he said at the news conference for foreign media correspondents.

“I believe I can start from minute one as a president with my knowledge of the government and administration and the management, and also the connections in the world… that’s what Egypt needs,” he said, speaking in English.

Moussa faces criticism by some protest groups for his involvement in Mubarak’s regime until 2001, but he said he believed in democracy and freedom.

He added that he would be willing to work with the Islamist-dominated parliament and senate.

“Egypt needs immediate work, to rebuild the country after the major shrinking in its fortunes,” he said.

Popular for his firm stances towards Israel as foreign minister and as Arab League chief, he said he wanted “the best of relations” with the United States.

“I don’t see any reason to refuse certain aid programs,” he said when asked about Washington’s annual aid of more than one billion dollars to Egypt.

The country’s economy has been hard hit by the aftershocks of last year’s 18-day uprising that ousted Mubarak and during the subsequent turbulent and at times restless transitional period overseen by the military.

( / 22.04.2012)

Dit waren de plannen in het Catshuis (twv 14,2 miljard)

VVD, CDA en PVV waren het voordat PVV-leider Geert Wilders de finale onderhandelingen staakte, in principe eens over een bezuinigingspakket van 14,2 miljard euro. Dat had het begrotingstekort van Nederland in 2013 teruggebracht naar 2,8 procent, zei VVD-fractievoorzitter Stef Blok vandaag.

  • De doorrekeningen van het CPB
    Open pdf (1,1 MB)

Er was besloten om het lage btw-tarief van 6 naar 7 procent te brengen en het hoge tarief van 19 naar 21 procent. Dat had 4,7 miljard euro opgeleverd, maar zou later weer zijn teruggeven via een verlaging van de inkomstenbelasting.

Ook waren de partijen het vorige week eens over een snellere verhoging van de AOW-leeftijd. Die zou al in 2015 naar 66 zijn gegaan. Verder zou een bevriezing van de ambtenarensalarissen 4 miljard euro opbrengen. Bezuinigingen in de zorg zouden 1,8 miljard euro opbrengen, onder meer door per recept een eigen bijdrage van 9 euro te vragen.

Op ontwikkelingssamenwerking zou 750 miljoen euro worden bespaard. De hypotheekrenteaftrek zou voor nieuwe aflossingsvrije hypotheken niet meer gelden. De huren zouden marktconform worden.

Een aantal van de maatregelen op een rij:

– Beperking van de hypotheekrenteaftrek voor aflossingvrije hypotheken (alleen nieuwe gevallen)

– Bevriezing van lonen en uitkeringen, met uitzondering van de AOW

– Het ‘naar voren halen’ van de verhoging van de AOW-leeftijd (66 jaar in 2015)

–  Korting op ontwikkelingshulp ter grootte van 750 miljoen euro

–  Nieuwe bezuinigingen op de publieke omroep, oplopend tot 75 miljoen euro

– Een eigen bijdrage voor medicijnen (negen euro)

– De invoering van een sociaal leenstelsel ter vervanging van de studiebeurs

– Een ouderbijdrage voor het schoolboekenfonds

– Het vervallen van de onbelaste kilometervergoeding

( / 22.04.2012)

UNRWA and OCHA condemn the forced displacement of 67 Palestine refugees in the occupied West Bank

22 April 2012
East Jerusalem, West Bank

During the week, 67 Palestine refugees, more than half of them children, were forcibly displaced as a result of the eviction or demolition of their homes and other civilian structures. In one incident on 18 April, the Israeli authorities demolished the homes of seven refugee families in the Palestinian community of Al Khalayleh, displacing them for the third time in six months. The following day, the Israeli authorities demolished and confiscated emergency tents provided by humanitarian actors in response to the demolitions.

The Director of UNRWA’s West Bank Office, Felipe Sanchez, condemned the demolitions: “The forced eviction of Palestine refugees and the demolition of Palestinian homes and other civilian structures in the occupied West Bank, including East Jerusalem, is contrary to international law. We urge the Israeli authorities to find an immediate solution to enable the Palestinian population of the occupied West Bank, to lead a normal life, in full realisation of their rights”, he added.

In another incident on 18 April, two Palestinian families were forcibly evicted from their homes in the East Jerusalem suburb of Beit Hanina. The homes, located in a Palestinian neighborhood, were subsequently handed over to Israeli settlers, who reportedly intend to build a new settlement in the area. The eviction was condemned on 18 April by the United Nations Resident and Humanitarian Coordinator for the occupied Palestinian territory, Maxwell Gaylard, stating that this may run counter to international law, including the Fourth Geneva Convention.

The Head of the Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs in the oPt (OCHA), Ramesh Rajasingham said, “more than 1500 Palestinians have lost their homes as a result of demolitions and evictions since the beginning of 2011. Forced evictions and demolitions cause extensive human suffering, increase humanitarian needs and vulnerability.”

( / 22.04.2012)

Israel To Build New 217 Units In Jerusalem

The Civil Coalition for Palestinian Rights In Jerusalem reported that the Israeli government decided to expand the illegal Nof Zion settlement outpost in Jabal Al-Mokabber, in occupied East Jerusalem, buy approving the construction of additional 217 units.

File - Israeli Settlements - PNN
File – Israeli Settlements –

The project falls under a plan, known as Project 8815; 100 units were built in the first stage of the project, while the second phase will lead to the construction of 217 new units.

The Coalition reported that, on March, 29, Israel published details of the plan for appeals purposes, and also announced bids or the construction of 645 units for Jewish settlers in Jabal Al-Mokabber, both residential and commercial units, and another bid for the construction of a commercial area.

Israel also announced bids for the construction of 180 units in Gan Ayalon neighborhood, in Givat Zeev illegal settlement.

The Coalition further stated that Israel announced that structural plan of a number of hotels that will be built on lands that belong to Beit Safa Palestinian town, in East Jerusalem, adding that most of the lands in question belong to the Greek Orthodox Patriarchate in the city.

Israel also intends to build stone factories on lands that belong to the residents of Doura and Ath-Thahiriyya, near the southern West Bank city of Hebron, in addition to construction projects in resource-rich areas located on 12 square/meters near Rammoun, Anata, Ath-Thahiriyya and Doura.

The Coalition said that the illegal Israeli policies in occupied East Jerusalem, and the West Bank, are based on the principle of significantly increasing the number of Jewish settlers on the expense of the Palestinians and their lands, by illegal land grab, and by imposing harsh restrictions on the Palestinians to prevent them from building homes or projects, in addition to the home demolition policies.

( / 22.04.2012)

Official: Israel intercepts ship for security check

JERUSALEM (Reuters) — Israeli naval forces intercepted a Liberian-flagged cargo ship in the Mediterranean on Sunday and troops have boarded the vessel for a “security check”, military sources said.

The foreign cargo ship was stopped off the coast of Lebanon, on suspicion of carrying arms to either Lebanon or the Gaza Strip, Israeli daily Haaretz reported.

Israel routinely patrols the seas for ships suspected of carrying weapons destined for Palestinian militants. A year ago Israel seized a cargo ship it said held Iranian-supplied arms intended for the Hamas-ruled Gaza Strip.

The official said so far “nothing outstanding has been found” on the ship, and declined to provide details, describing the interception as “routine protection of our territorial waters.”

An Israeli military source said the ship was seized about 160 miles (260 km) off the Israeli coast, and that troops were conducting a “very thorough search of its cargo.”

In the earlier seaborne interception in March 2011, Israel said the vessel it seized had set sail from Syria, had stopped in Turkey and had been destined for Alexandria in Egypt.

Palestinians use a network of tunnels to smuggle weapons into Gaza from Egypt. Palestinian militants in Gaza often fire rockets at Israel and say it is in response to Israeli raids in their coastal territory.

( / 22.04.2012)