24 Tips om een goede moslim(a) te zijn

1. Word elke ochtend wakker met het besef dat je Allah, geprezen en verheven is Hij, moet bedanken voor alles. 

2. Stel Allah, geprezen en verheven is Hij, boven alles. 

3. Verbreed je Kennis, door verzen uit de Edele Koran te lezen(5 per dag), naar de moskee te gaan om tot Allah te bidden, en lees over Islam. 

4. Bid het gebed Dhuha, na zonsopgang. 

5. Als iemand iets kwaads bij je doet, reageer dan terug op een vriendelijke manier, en vraag Allah om hem te vergeven. De profeet Mohammed, Allah’s vrede en zegen zij met zei: “Doe geen kwaad en vergeld geen kwaad met kwaad” Laat goed gedrag zien opdat je diegene tot Islam kunt uitnodigen. 

6. Wanneer je boos bent, gedenk Allah, Geprezen en Verheven is Hij, en bedenk je dat het leven te kort is om boos te worden. 

7. Lees de vele ahadith die er zijn, zodat je de uitspraken van de Profeet (sws) kunt overpeinzen en zijn soenna volgen.

8. Wanneer je gelukkig bent / voelt, deel je geluk met anderen en prijs Allah, Geprezen en Verheven is Hij. 

9. Wanneer je iets slechts of beschamend overkomt, bedenk je dat het altijd erger had kunnen zijn, bedenk je de zegeningen van geduld in. Bedank Allah, Geprezen en Verheven is Hij dat het niet erger is geworden. 

10. Doe iets goeds voor andere, één keer in de zoveel tijd, bijvoorbeeld het voeden van de armen: De profeet (sallallahoe alaihi wasalaam) zei: ‘Er is geen goedheid in een persoon die niet vriendelijk of aardig is’ 

11. Blijf geloven dat je Allah’s liefde voor jou kan winnen door er voor te werken ( Bidden, Vasten, Zakaat geven, andere goede daden verrichten etc. ) en zo win je ook de liefde van zijn dienaars. 

12. Bedenk hoe Almachtig Allah is door alles wat hij heeft geschapen. Kijk om je heen en besef dat Hij de Grootste is. 

13. Houd van mensen die van Allah, Geprezen en Verheven is Hij, houden, houd van ze omwille van Allah, zo ben je er zeker van dat je voor Allah leeft, voor hem lief hebt, en zijn vijanden veracht. 

14. Zoek de juiste manier om jezelf te uitten, en als je denkt dat wat je wilt gaan zeggen kwaad kan doen aan iemand, zwijg dan. 

15. Wanneer je wat tijd voor je zelf neemt blijf Allah, Geprezen en Verheven is Hij, gedenken bij alles wat je doet. 

16. Vraag Allah, Geprezen en Verheven is Hij, om de dwalenden te zegenen en te leiden naar het rechte pad. ( Siraat Al Moestaqiem ) 

17. Heb je ouders lief, bedien ze als hoogheden en luister naar ze, volg op wat ze je bevelen, maar wanneer ze je belemmeren in jouw geloof in Allah luister dan niet. 

18. Glimlach naar iedereen, want dat gebaar kan veel betekenen voor iemand, en zelfs een glimlach is een goede daad. 

19. Vergeef, vergeet en lach. ( Vergeef iemand die je onrecht heeft aangedaan, vergeet wat hij heeft aangedaan en lach met hem en beschouw hem als je vriend / vriendin ) 

20. Huilen is niet alleen iets voor vrouwen, huilen is menselijk, en laat je tranen gaan wanneer je Allah, Geprezen en Verheven is Hij, gedenkt. 

21. Wanneer mensen kritiek op je hebben omdat je iets doet, kijk of datgene wat je doet Allah’s welbehagen krijgt, als dat zo is, laat die mensen die kritiek geven en bedenk je dat de Profeet, Allah’s vrede en zegen zij met Hem, en zijn metgezellen ook kritiek kregen, bespot werden en zelfs lichamelijk aangevallen werden. Dus heb geduld. 

22. Probeer zoveel mogelijk Koran te lezen, en probeer ook zoveel mogelijk te lezen. Als je leest, probeer te begrijpen wat er staat lees niet alleen met je ogen, maar met je hart. 

23. Laat populariteit, rijkdom of macht je niet doen dwalen, want het is niet voor altijd. 

24. Kijk niet neer op anderen, want misschien beschouwt Allah, Geprezen en Verheven is Hij, ze wel hoger dan jij zelf.

(www.trotsopislam.nl / 01.11.2012)

Fatah official seriously injured in Lebanon

Palestinian gunmen try to calm angry protesters at the Ain al-Hilweh refugee camp in June

LEBANON (Ma’an) — A Fatah official in Lebanon was seriously wounded on Thursday after he was shot several times in a Palestinian refugee camp, Lebanese press reported.

Lebanese newspaper The Daily Star said a gunman wearing a balaclava shot Imad al-Saadi with an automatic rifle in Ein al-Hilweh camp.

Al-Saadi was taken to hospital with head injuries, a Palestinian journalist in Lebanon said.

The refugee camp in south Lebanon was put on military alert after the shooting, the Lebanese Broadcasting Corporation said.

Palestinian refugees in Lebanon have long suffered discrimination and clashes broke out in Palestinian camps in June, which officials blamed on Islamist groups.

(www.maannews.net / 01.11.2012)

Haniyeh lauds Christian MP at Gaza funeral

GAZA CITY (Ma’an) — Political leaders joined Christian mourners at the funeral of a prominent Christian lawmaker in the Gaza Strip on Thursday.

Hamas Prime Minister Ismail Haniyeh praised Husaam al-Tawil’s service to Palestine at the church ceremony in Gaza City.

Al-Tawil died in Egypt on Wednesday after a long battle with poor health.

He was elected to the PLC in 2005 as an independent candidate, but with the support of Hamas. Al-Tawil was also the secretary-general of the council of Arab Orthodox Churches.

“These are very sad moments,” Haniyeh said at the funeral. “We lost a national leader and a human being who was loved by all.”

“His honesty was demonstrated through his election by both Muslims and Christians, when he took more than 54,000 votes,” the prime minister said.

Haniyeh applauded al-Tawil for his commitment to ending the division between Hamas and its secular West Bank rivals, Fatah, calling him “one of reconciliation’s most important advocates.”

(www.maannews.net / 01.11.2012)

The Revival of Islam in Post-Soviet Central Asia

I initially started off with looking at how Western countries viewed the restoration of religion when Soviet power failed in Central Asia. Researching the concerns that surrounded Islam in post-Soviet countries during the past three decades raised my blood pressure. Any topic relating to Islam is personal and dear to me due to my independent decision to practice Islam, and seeing that there are “fears” associated with a discussion about Islam in this region hurts me to my core. “Islamist” should not be a title for one that assigns extremism to the Islamic religion, just as the word “extreme” should never be used to describe Islam. Instead of focusing on how Western countries fear of radical movements, I will discuss the evolution and revival of Islam in the former Soviet region and what are the concerns it brings for populations within the area.

During the time of Communist rule, Islam and other religions were suppressed due to the official Soviet ideology of atheism and its view that their practices and beliefs are obstacles to revolutionary change (Pulsipher & Pulsipher, 2009, p. 200). Prior to this suppression, “The December 4, 1917 declaration jointly signed by Lenin and Stalin said, ‘To the Muslims in Russia, be they Tartars of Volga, the inhabitants of Cremia, the Kaukaz of Siberia or Turkistan, the Turks of Kaukaz, the Charks, the dwellers of Kaukaz mountains, to all those whose mosques and worship places and whose faith and traditions were trampled upon by the Tsars of Russia or the other tyrants; Be assured that your traditions and faith and your national and cultural institutions shall be free from this day and nobody will object to these in future. You are free to organize your national life without any interference and obstacles from outside’” (Devlet, 1986). The fact that the government took back its promise highlights that the Soviet Union soon realized that Islam is an obstacle to gaining popularity. Anti-Islamic, atheistic propaganda and measures were taken by the state, and lasted more than 70 years. This made “the observance and expansion of Islam impossible and the number of believers, or more correctly, of practicing Muslims has decreased” (Devlet, 1986). The Muslim population of the Soviet Union in 1980 was between 45 and 50 million, making it the sixth largest in the world after Indonesia, Pakistan, India, Bangladesh, and Turkey. It has, therefore, a national and cultural significance beyond the purely religious one. (Devlet, 1986) A total of 80 million are now present in the former Soviet Union region (Kalaam, 1991). Of the 28,000 mosques from the Russian Empire period only about 400 mosques remain today (Devlet, 1986).

Until the 1970s, Islam in the Soviet Union had been largely depoliticized. After the fall of Communism, Islam revived. Muslims practiced openly and Islamic movements became politically important (Pulsipher, 2009). The Islamic Revolution in Iran and the 1978 civil war in Afghanistan that resulted of the mujahidin’s counteroffensive against the Marxist regime reinforced Soviet fears that Islam might be an ideological, socioeconomic, and political competitor. (Cummings, 2003, p. 70) Today’s regimes have the same worry, fearing Islam might be used as a platform to voice the population’s social criticism. This fear has led to a wholesale condemnation of anti-establishment Islamic movements, and has often been used as an excuse to repress opposition or religious movements more generally. By the mid 1990s,Chechnya and Tajikistan had a significant presence of Islam playing a political role with the government, whereas it was in opposition with the Uzbekistani government. (Cummings, 2003, p. 70) Despite the majority of Muslims in this region, they were unable to unite, typically prevented by controversy over arising militant groups that claimed association with Islam.Tajikistanlost its Islamic political dominance after its civil war when peace settlements were signed in 1997, becoming a secular state by 2001. Dominantly popular inCentral Asia, despite its Middle Eastern roots, is Hizb Ut-Tahrir (The Islamic Freedom Organization). This is because of the Hizb’s alluring call for peace through nonviolence, organization, and criticisms of the region’s governments who were unable to deliver socioeconomic stability and welfare. The Islamic Movement of Uzbekistan on the other hand called for violence. As agreed by scholars, neither group has respect for Islam, culture, or fear of the current regime. Despite the presence of these groups, many Muslims tried to be active in politics and prevent radicalism based on baseless religious claims. Countries with military rise in Central Asia lack such true Islamic regulation. (Cummings, 2003, p. 71) Practicing Muslim activists know that Islam can be used as a force towards the common wealth of independent states, rather than an obstacle or threat. Despite regime fears of opposition, scholars are advising them to allow pluralism to take place in their countries, for an example: countries are advised to legalize Hizb Ut-Tahrir to prevent it from allying with radical militant groups to achieve their social goals. (Cummings, 2003, p. 72)

Within Muslim populated countries of Central Asia is the common fear of which “sect” of Islam will gain the majority—Sunnism or Shiism. In Azerbaijan, both sects had united prior to Soveit rule. Islam thrived under Communist rule in Azerbaijan as it did in the other countries, but largely became Shia afterIran’s influence on the newly independent state. However, this influence was opposed by the secular Turkish ideologies, andIran’s Shia revolution failed to establish popularity inAzerbaijan’s government. Abdukadir Sezgin, a Turkish Sunni cleric wrote a book distinguishing Sunniism and Shiism in Azerbaijan which was able to establish clearer differences of the two sects and unfortunately reinforce separation between the population. The government repeatedly attempted to control religious life, but failed to do so. Mass protests for social improvement (not religious demands) in the early 2000s by Shias gave the sect political support, leading to successful presidential elections. However, since 2006, this movement has been taken over by the government’s propaganda. Religious schools, literature, and any other Islamic resources, either Sunni or Shia, have been shut down. (Goyushov, 2008)

It is difficult to conclude where the Islamic movement will move from here for Central Asia due to the governments’ strong hold of secularism. Islam has yet to be accepted by the populations as inward spirituality, before it can be used for political or social promotions. The primary goal of governments in the region is to establish stable secular states, and so they see religion as an obstacle, as did the Soviets. Also, Western powers have their own fears of religious revival, because they believe they inflame radical organizations.

NOTE: I didn’t go into the issues surrounding Afghanistan, because I believe that it needed a whole post to itself. An excellent article to read for background information about the country and its current affairs is “Afghanistan, Another Untold Story” by Michael Parenti.

 

Maps of Muslim in the Soviet Union:

Ethnicities:

Population:

 

References

Cummings, S. (2003). Islam in the Former Soviet Union. The Global Review of Ethnopolitics, 3(2). p. 67-72. Retrieved from http://www.ethnopolitics.org/ethnopolitics/archive/volume_III/issue_2/cummings.  pdf

Develet, N. (1986). The Present Situation of the Soviet Muslims: The Example of Kazan  Tatars (Web Version). Muslim Reader. Retrieved from http://www.everymuslim.net/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=56&Itemid=30

Goyushov, A. (2008) Islamic Revival in Azerbaijan. Current Trends in Islamist Ideology, 7. Retrieved from http://www.currenttrends.org/research/detail/islamic-revival-in-azerbaijan

Kalaam, A. (1991). Muslims in the U.S.S.R: A New Dawn—This is a summary of the article developed by Dr. A. Zahoor. Message International. Retrieved fromhttp://www.cyberistan.org/islamic/ussrmuslims.htm.

Pulsipher, M. & Pulsipher, A. (2009). World Regional Geography Concepts. W. H. Freeman & Co.: New York, NY.

(sinseriously.wordpress.com / 01.11.2012)

Abbas hints has no “right of return” to home in Israel

  • Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas attends a meeting with Israeli politicians in the West Bank city of Ramallah October 14, 2012. REUTERS/Mohamad Torokman
  • Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas attends a meeting with Israeli politicians in …

JERUSALEM (Reuters) – Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas made a rare if symbolic concession to Israel on Thursday, saying he had no permanent claim on the town from which he was driven as a child during the 1948 war of the Jewish state’s founding.

Among several disputes deadlocking Middle East peace talks has been the Palestinians’ demand that as many as five million of their compatriots be granted the right to return to lands in Israel that they or their kin lost.

Israel rules this out, fearing an influx of Arabs that would eliminate its Jewish majority, and argues the refugees should resettle in a future Palestinian state in the West Bank and Gaza Strip, territories it occupied in the 1967 war.

Speaking to the top-rated Israeli television newscast, Abbas was asked whether he wanted to live in Safed, his boyhood town in the Galilee region of what had been British-ruled Palestine and is now northern Israel.

“I visited Safed before once. But I want to see Safed. It’s my right to see it, but not to live there,” Abbas told Channel 2, speaking in English from the West Bank city of Ramallah.

“Palestine now for me is ’67 borders, with East Jerusalem as its capital. This is now and forever … This is Palestine for me. I am (a) refugee, but I am living in Ramallah. I believe that (the) West Bank and Gaza is Palestine and the other parts (are) Israel.”

Abbas has defied Israel and the United States by planning to ask the U.N. General Assembly to upgrade the Palestinians to a non-member state. Facing possible punitive Israeli and U.S. sanctions, Abbas has promised an immediate return to peace talks after the U.N. vote, which the Palestinians are likely to win.

The televised remarks, which were excoriated by Abbas’s Palestinian Islamist rivals, also appeared aimed at influencing Israelis ahead of their January 22 legislative election.

Polls currently predict an easy win for Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, a rightist who says he wants to restart talks with Abbas but who has championed Jewish settlement of East Jerusalem and the West Bank – the reason the Palestinians gave for breaking off the last round of negotiations in 2010.

“NO THIRD ARMED INTIFADA”

Some Netanyahu government officials have voiced scepticism about Abbas’s ability to deliver a peace accord, after he lost control of Gaza – from which Israel withdrew in 2005 – to Hamas Islamists in a brief civil war two years later.

On Channel 2, Abbas sought to play up his security control over Palestinian-run areas of the West Bank, saying that as long as he was in power “there will no armed, third armed Intifada (revolt against Israel). Never.”

“We don’t want to use terror. We don’t want to use force. We don’t want to use weapons. We want to use diplomacy. We want to use politics. We want to use negotiations. We want to use peaceful resistance. That’s it.”

Netanyahu’s office had no immediate comment on the interview, which was aired as the prime minister returned from a visit to France. Israel has long blamed Abbas for the stalled diplomacy, saying his insistence it freeze settlements – which are widely viewed as illegal abroad – amounted to preconditions.

Paul Hirschson, a spokesman for Israel’s Foreign Ministry, said the onus remained on Abbas to return to negotiations:

“If he (Abbas) wants to see Safed, or anywhere else in Israel, for that matter, we would happily show him anywhere. But there has to be a desire to move forward on the peace process.”

As Abbas is not an Israeli citizen, Hirschson added, “he doesn’t have a right to live in Israel. We agree on that.”

In Gaza, Hamas denounced Abbas, saying he spoke only for himself. The Islamist movement does not recognise Israel and has regularly exchanged fire with it.

“No Palestinian would accept ceding the right of our people to return to homes, villages and towns from which they were displaced,” said Hamas spokesman Sami Abu Zuhri.

“If Abu Mazen (Abbas) does not want Safed, Safed would be honoured not to host people like him.”

Secret Palestinian memoranda leaked to the media last year showed that Abbas had, during talks with the previous, centrist Israeli government, been willing to concede on some core demands – including by accepting a cap on refugees admitted to Israel.

Under Netanyahu, Israel has campaigned for the hundreds of thousands of Jews who it took in from Arab countries after the 1948 war to be recognised as refugees, proposing they be seen as a demographic counter-balance to dispossessed Palestinians.

(uk.news.yahoo.com / 01.11.2012)

Palestinian President tells Israelis no new armed uprising on his watch

JERUSALEM –  The Palestinian president is reaching out to Israelis ahead of a trip to the U.N. where he will seek an upgraded observer status for his territory.

Mahmoud Abbas vowed to prevent another violent Palestinian uprising, or Intifada, like that of last decade.

“We don’t want to use terror…we want to use diplomacy, we want to use politics, we want to use negotiations, we want to use peaceful resistance,” Abbas told Israel’s Channel 2 TV Thursday.

Abbas hopes to obtain “nonmember state” status at a U.N. General Assembly vote later this month.

Palestinians believe the vote will force Israel to withdraw from current positions to lines it held before the 1967 war or face international legal action. Israel says negotiations alone will fix borders between it and any future Palestine.

(www.foxnews.com / 01.11.2012)

Turkey using anti-terrorism law to quash debate

GENEVA (Reuters) — Turkey is using a vague counterterrorism law to prosecute many activists, lawyers and journalists, often holding them for long pre-trial periods without access to a lawyer, United Nations human rights experts said on Thursday.

The UN Human Rights Committee said after reviewing Turkey’s record for the first time that the right to due process is sharply curbed under its 1991 Anti-Terrorism Law and that some of its provisions are incompatible with international law.

“We’re worried about the vagueness of the definition of the terrorist act in the 1991 law and the very far-reaching, unacceptable restrictions on the right of due process for accused people and the high number of cases in which human rights defenders, lawyers, journalists and even children are charged under the anti-terrorism law,” Michael O’Flaherty, committee vice-chairman, told a news briefing.

He added: “Not for terrorism, but for the free expression of their opinions and ideas, in particular in the context of non-violent discussion of the Kurdish issue.”

Almost 100 journalists are in prison as well as thousands of activists, lawyers, politicians, military officers and others. Most are accused of plots against the government or support for outlawed Kurdish militants.

The UN committee, composed of 18 independent experts, examined the records of five countries, including Turkey, in upholding fundamental civil and political rights.

During the debate, they voiced concern about Turkey’s anti-terror law’s restriction of access to a lawyer for the first 24 hours when they said the risk of torture was the highest.

Erdogan Iscan, director-general of Turkey’s foreign ministry, said the Anti-Terror Law allowed authorities to protect the public and ensure a swift judicial process. It was in accordance with international human rights treaties.

The right to contact a lawyer was an absolute right and authorities had a policy of zero-tolerance to torture, he said.

The experts urged Turkey to bring its laws into line with the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, a landmark UN pact ratified by 147 states including Turkey.

“Detainees do not have access to an effective mechanism to challenge the lawfulness of their pre-trial detention and do not always in practice have prompt access to a lawyer,” they said.

Activists and journalists are prosecuted under provisions including a ban on criticizing the military, they said.

The watchdog Committee to Protect Journalists says Turkey has jailed more reporters than Iran, China or Eritrea.

Although Prime Minister Tayyip Erdogan won a third term last year, many secular Turks fear his socially conservative AK Party has Islamist tendencies that threaten the secular republic. There is growing criticism of his authoritarian style of rule.

Jailed Kurdish militants on hunger strike may start to die within the next 10 days, Turkey’s main medical association warned, saying the prime minister’s dismissal of the protest as a “show” risked hardening their resolve.

(www.maannews.net / 01.11.2012)

Israel admits killing deputy of late Palestinian leader Yasser Arafat

Yasser Arafat (right) consults with Khalil al-Wazir (left) during the Palestine National Congress conference in April 1987 in Algiers.

Lifting a nearly 25-year veil of secrecy, Israel has admitted that it killed the deputy of Palestinian leader Yasser Arafat in a 1988 raid in Tunisia.
Israel has long been suspected of slaying Khalil al-Wazir, who was better known by his nom de guerre Abu Jihad, in Tunis, the country’s capital.

But only Thursday did the country’s military censor clear the Yediot Ahronot daily to publish the information, including an interview with the commando who killed him.

Dozens of brazen operations have been attributed to Israel over the decades, but Israel rarely takes responsibility.

The acknowledgement gives a rare glimpse into the country’s covert operations.

Abu Jihad founded the Palestinian Liberation Organization with Arafat and was blamed for a series of attacks against Israelis.

‘An outlaw country’
Fatah Leader, Colonel Jibril Rojoub, told NBC News Thursday that the admission was “not news, the Palestinian people always knew that Israel was behind this assassination.”

But he added that the Tunisian government now had “the right to take Israel to court.”

“This proves that Israel is an outlaw country, and this proves that all Israeli leaders belong in the ICC [International Criminal Court],” Rojoub said.

Rojoub was with Abu Jihad at his home in Tunisia hours before he was assassinated.

Israel, Iran name checks illustrate America’s twin obsessions

In August, a French court opened a murder inquiry into the death of Arafat, following allegations by his widow, Suha, that he might have been poisoned.

Arafat died in a military hospital in Paris in November 2004 at the age of 75, a month after he was flown in a seriously ill condition from his headquarters in Ramallah, West Bank.

French court opens murder inquiry into Arafat’s death

French doctors who treated him were unable to establish the cause of death, and many Arabs suspect Israel was behind his decline.

In July, a Swiss institute said it had discovered high levels of the radioactive element polonium-210 on Arafat’s clothing, which was supplied by his widow.

However, the Institut de Radiophysique in Lausanne said that symptoms described in Arafat’s medical reports were not consistent with polonium-210 and conclusions could not be drawn as to whether he had been poisoned.

(worldnews.nbcnews.com / 01.11.2012)

Action Alert: Please support the World Social Forum – Free Palestine!

 

Dear readers;

Today I received this alert in regard to the current Zionist lobbying efforts against the World Social Forum (WSF) – Free Palestine (FP), which is going to take place in Porto Alegre, Brazil, from November 28-December 1, 2012. At this point the Zionist lobby in Brazil has succeeded in cancelling the venue (Usina do Gasômetro) that had been booked for the WSF-FP.

As a result I am asking you to please write to the mayor and the provincial governor asking that the WSF-FP booking of the “Usina do Gasômetro” is reinstated and not to succumb to Zionist pressure.

Porto Alegre mayor José Fortunati:

gilalmeida@gp.prefpoa.com.br (Mr. Gil Almeida, adviser to the mayor)

 
Rio Grande do Sul’s Governor, Tarso Genro:

 

For more information, please read the press release by WSF organizer and journalist, Baby Siqueira Abrão, which I have included below.

Many thanks in advance,

Sofia Smith

——
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Zionists are in contact with the mayor of Porto Alegre (PoA) and the governor of Rio Grande do Sul (PoA is the capital of Rio Grande do Sul state) against the World Social Forum Free Palestine. In part they succeed, because now the WSF have lost the Usina do Gasômetro, the place where it would be held.

Brazilian Organizing Committee is trying to maintain Gasômetro, but, as we don’t know what will happen, we are trying to ensure other places in Porto Alegre for the conferences, activities, lectures and a local for the media work (the traditional one and the independent one, as well as the News Agency Free Palestine, which I coordinate and whose journalists will keep  informed the public and the media about what is going on at the WSFFP in real time).
The Zionists from Federação Israelita do Rio Grande do Sul (Israeli Federation) said to the governor, Tarso Genro, that they fear attacks from Palestinian “radicals” against their properties. It make some of us to think that they can promote a false flag in PoA and blame the Palestinians for it.
Tarso Genro suggested a meeting among Palestinian and Israelis ambassadors, for demonstrations of good will and peace, but the Palestinian ambassador in Brazil, Ibrahim Alzeben, refused the proposal. Palestine is a occupied country which people have been suffering ethnic cleaning since 19th century. Palestinians want and deserve freedom, justice and sovereignty, not normalization.
Recently, the Ethic Tribunal which would judge the Zionists acts against Palestinians and which would take place in Buenos Aires, capital of Argentina — an initiative from Argentinean pro Palestine organizations — was forbidden due to the pressure of Zionist lobby in Argentina.
It’s important that we join efforts for denounce those Zionist’s acts all over the world and that all of us lodge protests against those acts, through which Zionists want to silence Latin American public and prevent them to know the true about what Zionism movement is doing in Palestine, from before Nakba until now.
We count on you for publishing this alert and our protest against that action which is an attack against freedom of meeting and expression, and against the rescue of the historical true.
Thanks,

Baby Siqueira Abrão
WSF organizer and journalist
*Brasil de Fato  -  Carta Maior*
Brasil: +55 11 4321-3863 e 8247-6252

(psdic.blogspot.nl / 01.11.2012)

Voices from the Occupation: Sally L. – Settler violence

Voices from the Occupation: Sally L. – Settler violence

Ahrar (By: DCI)– On 19 September 2012, an 11-year-old girl is attacked by a settler when she and her brother confront him after he damaged their water tank. 

“I live in the old city of Hebron, about 10 meters away from the Jewish outpost of Abraham,” says 11-year-old Sally.  “On Wednesday, 19 September 2012, we heard a loud noise on the rooftop of our house, and we realized that our water tank was being damaged,” she says. “My older brother and I went up to the roof and we found three settlers in their mid twenties, wearing white shirts and gray trousers. One of the water tanks had been flipped over and the water was pouring out.”

When Sally’s brother started arguing with the settlers, one of them pushed him so hard he tripped over and fell. “Then, the same settler pushed me and grabbed me by the neck while saying things in Hebrew. I was in pain and very scared and shivering,” says Sally. “I thought he would push me down the stairs, but then he released me and went away with the other two settlers.”

“About two minutes later, six Israeli soldiers arrived and went up to one of the settlers’ houses that are opposite our house. They never asked us what happened, and when a foreign activist tried to explain to them in English what the settlers had done, they ignored him.”

According to Sally, the settlers frequently harass them and damage their property. “My brother has not filed a complaint to the Israeli police or any other authority because it is useless,” she adds.

(ahrar.ps / 01.11.2012)