Prophet Muhammed(Pbuh) in the Bible

bible_prophecies_of_muhammad_part_1_of_4_001BIBLE PROPHECIES ABOUT THE ADVENT OF MUHAMMAD

Those who follow the Apostle, the unlettered Prophet, Whom they find mentioned in their own Scriptures, in the Torah and the Gospel… (Holy Qu’ran: VII – 157; Translation: Yusif Ali) Abraham is widely regarded as the Patriarch of monotheism and the common father of the Jews, Christians and Muslims.

Through His second son, Isaac, came all Israelite prophets including such towering figures as Jacob, Joseph, Moses, David, Solomon and Jesus. May peace and blessings be upon them all.

The advent of these great prophets was in partial fulfillment of God’s promises to bless the nations of earth through the descendents of Abraham (Genesis12:2-3).Such fulfillment is wholeheartedly accepted by Muslims whose faith considers the belief in and respect of all prophets an article of faith.

BLESSINGS OF ISHMAEL AND ISAAC

Was the first born son of Abraham (Ishmael) and his descendants included in God’s covenant and promise? A few verses from the Bible may help shed some light on this question;

1) Genesis 12:2-3 speaks of God’s promise to Abraham and his descendants before any child was born to him.

2) Genesis 17:4 reiterates God’s promise after the birth of Ishmael and before the birth of Isaac.

3) In Genesis, ch. 21. Isaac is specifically blessed but Ishmael was also specifically blessed and promised by God to become “a great nation” especially in Genesis 21:13, 18.

4) According to Deuteronomy 21:15-17 the traditional rights and privileges of the first born son are not to be affected by the social status of his mother (being a “free” woman such as Sarah, Isaac’s mother, or a “Bondwoman” such as Hagar, Ishmael’s mother). This is only consistent with the moral and humanitarian principles of all revealed faiths.

5) The full legitimacy of Ishmael as Abraham’s son and “seed” and the full legitimacy of his mother, Hagar, as Abraham’s wife are clearly stated in Genesis 21:13 and 16:3. After Jesus, the last Israelite messenger and prophet, it was time that God’s promise to bless Ishmael and his descendants be fulfilled. Less than 600years after Jesus, came the last messenger of God, Muhammad, from the progeny of Abraham through Ishmael. God’s blessing of both of the main branches of Abraham’s family tree was now fullfilled. But are there additional corroborating evidence that the Bible did in fact foretell the advent of prophet Muhammad?

.

MUHAMMAD:

The Prophet Like Unto Moses

Long time after Abraham, God’s promise to send the long-awaited Messenger was repeated this time in Moses’ words.

In Deuteronomy 18:18, Moses spoke of the prophet to be sent by God who is:

1) From among the Israelite’s “brethren”, a reference to their Ishmaelite cousins as Ishmael was the other son of Abraham who was explicitly promised to become a “great nation”.

2) A prophet like unto Moses. There were hardly any two prophets ,who were so much alike as Moses and Muhammad. Both were given comprehensive law code of life, both encountered their enemies and were victors in miraculous ways, both were accepted as prophets/statesmen and both migrated following conspiracies to assassinate them. Analogies between Moses and Jesus overlooks not only the above similarities but other crucial ones as well (e.g. the natural birth, family life and death of Moses and Muhammad but not of Jesus, who was regarded by His followers as the Son of God and not exclusively a messenger of God, as Moses and Muhammad were and as Muslim belief Jesus was).

·

THE AWAITED PROPHET WAS TO COME FROM ARABIA

Deuteronomy 33:1-2 combines references to Moses, Jesus and Muhammad. It speaks of God (i.e. God’s revelation) coming from Sinai, rising from Seir (probably the village of Sa’ir near Jerusalem) and shining forth from Paran. According to Genesis 21:21, the wilderness of Paran was the place where Ishmael settled (i.e. Arabia, specifically Mecca).

Indeed the King James version of the Bible mentions the pilgrims passing through the valley of Ba’ca (another name of Mecca) in Psalms 84:4-6.

Isaiah 42:1-13 speaks of the beloved of God. His elect and messenger who will bring down a law to be awaited in the isles and who “shall not fail nor be discouraged till he have set judgement on earth.” Verse 11, connects that awaited one with the descendants of Ke’dar. Who is Ke’dar? According to Genesis 25:13, Ke’dar was the second son of Ishmael, the ancestor of prophet Muhammad.

·

MUHAMMAD’S MIGRATION FROM MECCA TO MEDINA:

PROPHECIED IN THE BIBLE?

Habakkuk 3:3 speaks of God (God’s help) coming from Te’man (an Oasis North of Medina according to J. Hasting’s Dictionary of the Bible), and the holy one (coming) from Paran. That holy one who under persecution migrated from Paran (Mecca) to be received enthusiastically in Medina was none but prophet Muhammad.

Indeed the incident of the migration of the prophet and his persecuted followers is vividly described in Isaiah 21:13-17. That section foretold as well about the battle of Badr in which the few ill-armed faithful miraculously defeated the “mighty” men of Ke’dar, who sought to destroy Islam and intimidate their own folks who turned -to Islam.

·

THE QUR’AN (KORAN) FORETOLD IN THE BIBLE?

For twenty-three years, God’s words (the Qur’an) were truely put into Muhammad’s mouth. He was not the “author” of the Qur’an. The Qur’an was dictated to him by Angel Gabriel who asked Muhammad to simply repeat the words of the Qur’an as he heard them. These words were then committed to memory and to writing by those who hear them during Muhammad’s life time and under his supervision.

Was it a coincidence that the prophet “like unto Moses” from the “brethren” of the Israelites (i.e. from the lshmaelites) was also described as one in whose mouth God will put his words and that he will speak in the name of God, (Deuteronomy 18:18-20). Was it also a coincidence the “Paraclete” that Jesus foretold to come after Him was described as one who “shall not speak of himself, but whatsoever he shall hear, that shall he speak (John 16:13)

Was it another coincidence that Isaiah ties between the messenger connected with Ke’dar and a new song (a scripture in a new language) to be sang unto the Lord (Isaiah 42:10-11). More explicitly, prophesies Isaiah “For with stammering lips, and another tongue, will he speak to this people” (Isaiah 28:11). This latter verse correctly describes the “stammering lips” of Prophet Muhammad reflecting the state of tension and concentration he went through at the time of revelation. Another related point is that the Qur’an was revealed in piece-meals over a span of twenty three years. It is interesting to compare this with Isaiah 28:10 whichspeaks of the same thing.

·

THAT PROPHET- PARACLETE- MUHAMMAD

Up to the time of Jesus (peace be upon him), the Israelites were still awaiting for that prophet like unto Moses prophecied in Deuteronomy 18:18. When John the Baptist came, they asked him if he was Christ and he said “no”. They asked him if he was Elias and he said “no”. Then, in apparent reference to Deuteronomy 18:18, they asked him “Art thou that Prophet” and he answered, “no”. (John 1: 1 9-2 1).

In the Gospel according to John (Chapters 14, 15, 16) Jesus spoke of the “Paraclete” or comforter who will come after him, who will be sent by Father as another Paraclete, who will teach new things which the contemporaries of Jesus could not bear. While the Paraclete is described as the spirit of truth, (whose meaning resemble Muhammad’s famous title Al-Amin, the trustworthy), he is identified in one verse as the Holy Ghost (John 14:26). Such a designation is however inconsistent with the profile of that Paraclete. In the words of the Dictionary of the Bible, (Ed. J. Mackenzie) “These items, it must be admitted do not give an entirely coherent picture.”

Indeed history tells us that many early Christians understood the Paraclete to be a man and not a spirit. This might explain the followings who responded to some who claimed, without meeting the criteria stipulated by Jesus, to be the awaited “Paraciete”.

It was Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) who was the Paraclete, Comforter, helper, admonisher sent by God after Jesus. He testified of Jesus, taught new things which could not be borne at Jesus’ time, he spoke what he heard (revelation), he dwells with the believers (through his well-preserved teachings). Such teachings will remain forever because he was the last messenger of God, the only Universal Messenger to unite the whole of humanity under God and on the path of PRESERVED truth. He told of many things to come which “came to pass” in the minutest detail meeting, the criterion given by Moses to distinguish between the true prophet and the false prophets (Deuteronomy 18:22). He did reprove the world of sin, of righteousness and of judgement (John 16:8-11)

·

WAS THE SHIFT OF RELIGIOUS LEADERSHIP PROPHECIED?

Following the rejection of the last Israelite prophet, Jesus, it was about time that God’s promise to make Ishmael a great nation be fulfilled (Genesis 21:13, 18)

In Matthew 21:19-21, Jesus spoke of the fruitless fig tree (A Biblical symbol of prophetic heritage) to be cleared after being given a last chance of three years (the duration of Jesus’ ministry) to give fruit. In a later verse in the same chapter, Jesus said: “Therefore, say I unto you, The Kingdom of God shall be taken away from you, and given to a nation bringing forth the fruit thereof” (Matthew 21:43). That nation of Ishmael’s descendants (the rejected stone in Matthew 21:42) which was victorious against all super-powers of its time as prophecied by Jesus: “And whosoever shall fall on this stone shall be broken, but on whomsoever it shall fall, it will grind him to powder” (Matthew 21:44).

·

OUT OF CONTEXT COINCIDENCE?

Is it possible that the numerous prophecies cited here are all individually and combined out of context misinterpretations? Is the opposite true, that such infrequently studied verses fit together consistently and clearly point to the advent of the man who changed the course of human history, Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him). Is it reasonable to conclude that all these prophecies, appearing in different books of the Bible and spoken by various prophets at different times were all coincidence? If this is so here is another strange “coincidence”!

One of the signs of the prophet to come from Paran (Mecca) is that he will come with “ten thousands of saints” (Deuteronomy 33:2 KJV). That was the number of faithful who accompanied Prophet Muhammad to Paran (Mecca) in his victorious, bloodless return to his birthplace to destroy the remaining symbols of idolatry in the Ka’bah.

Says God as quoted by Moses:

And it shall come to pass, that whosoever will not hearken unto my words which he shall speak in my name, I will require it of him. (Deuteronomy 18:19)

Dear Readers:

May the light of truth shine in your heart and mind. May it lead you to peace and certitude in this life and eternal bliss in hereafter.

AMEEN

(www.whyislamtrue.com / 05.08.2012)

Hamas hails new UN condemnation of Israel

GAZA, (PIC)– The Hamas Movement hailed UN secretary-general Ban Ki-moon for his criticism of the Israeli violations in the occupied Palestinian territories as a “step in the right direction.”

“The remarks that were made by the UN secretary-general Ban Ki-moon in which he slammed the Zionist entity for its crimes against the Palestinian people and its mass punishment of Gaza people are step in the right direction taken by a high-level UN official,” senior Hamas official Salah Al-Bardawil stated in a press release on Saturday.

Bardawil emphasized that the UN and its institutions must translate these words into action so as to protect the victims and restore their rights in accordance with the UN charter.
In a report issued by the UN, Ki-moon said Israel’s violations including its settlement activities and acts of violence in the occupied Palestinian territories are disturbing and detrimental to the peace process.

he stated that the economic and social repercussions of the Israeli occupation cannot be tolerated and called on Israel to end its occupation of the Palestinian lands.

(occupiedpalestine.wordpress.com / 05.08.2012)

15 Egyptian soldiers killed at the Israel border

President Mohamed Morsi requests emergency meeting with SCAF to discuss border attack; Israeli troops ‘combing’ border area for ‘terrorists,’ says Netanyahu spokesperson

President Mohamed Morsi has called for an urgent meeting with Egypt’s Supreme Council of the Armed Forces (SCAF) to discuss the recent explosion that left a number of Egyptian soldiers dead and injured near Egypt’s border with the besieged Gaza Strip.

According to media reports on Sunday evening, the attack involved a military vehicle, reportedly hijacked earlier, which exploded around 7pm.

According to Egypt’s health ministry, at least 15 Egyptian soldiers were killed and seven injured in the explosion that went off at a military zone on Sunday, near the city of Rafah, according to Al-Ahram Arabic-language news portal.

Investigations by authorities into the attack have been immediately opened as no group has claimed responsibility yet.

However, the Egyptian state TV claimed that elements of Islamic extremist groups situated in the Sinai peninsula had carried out the attack by iftar (the hour when people have their meal that breaks the fast during Ramadan), but provided no details.

An anonymous Egyptian security official was quoted by Egypt’s state-run news agency as saying that Islamist elements who infiltrated Egypt from the Gaza Strip through tunnels are behind the attacks, along with other Islamists situated in the areas of El-Halal Mountain and El-Mahdia in eastern Sinai.

Meanwhile, Ofir Gendelman, a spokesperson for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, declared on Twitter that the Israeli Army had reported that no Israelis had been killed in the attack.

Gendelman also said that Israeli troops had been “combing” the nearby Kerem Abu Salam border area looking for “terrorists” whom he said had entered the self-proclaimed Jewish state from Egypt.

The Netanyahu spokesperson added that, apart from a military vehicle that had exploded and killed several Egyptian soldiers, a second vehicle, which he claimed had been “hijacked,” had been destroyed by the Israeli air force.

“One of the military vehicles exploded at the Kerem Shalom [Kerem Abu Salam] crossing. The second vehicle was targeted by the IDF [Israeli Defence Forces] from the air,” he tweeted in English.

He added in Arabic: “Apparently the ‘terrorists’ who penetrated the borders with two vehicles had planned for a very big terrorist operation on our territory. This attempt has been aborted.”

(english.ahram.org.eg / 05.08.2012)

Israels Bloody Spectacle in Eilat

What is behind the shooting spectacle in Eilat? Who planned and funded that bloody spectacle? What gains does the zionist occupation state promise itself from such a bloody spectacle of synthetic terror?

It would be wrong to believe that the hands of the Israeli intelligence system, (Shabak Police), Mossad, Amal and others, are clean of the bloody shooting spectacle of Thursday August 18 2011 north of the southern city of Eilat and near the border with Egypt’s Sinai Peninsula, in which eight Israelis were killed, among them a soldier, and several others were injured, among them two soldiers, one of them in critical conditions. Of the direct perpetrators, who were all conveniently killed, six are reported as unidentified, and pictures show bodies dressed in military uniform. After the reported attack in Eilat, two Egyptians soldiers and one policeman were murdered and two more Egyptian soldiers wounded, on Egyptian territory, during an Israeli attack carried out by Israeli aircraft while purportedly “searching for infiltrators” at the Egyptian border.

Whatever the identity of the persons who carried out the “operations” on the southern border of Israel – and whether with or without the knowledge – the “operations” have been funded and cooked at the kitchen of israeli intelligence system and with a full help and acknowledgement of the international intelligence agencies, particularly the CIA and another Arab intelligence regime.

Because Israel always justifies its atrocities with “radical muslims” and similar rubbish, it would also be wrong to believe that all the radical religious movements are not created and managed by the intelligence services of the USA, England, Israel, and their allies and vassals among the Arab dictatorial regimes, and that these groups of radical elements work in isolation from the orders of these intelligence services in order to achieve their top-level goals of damaging the name of Islam and Muslims and bringing disarray into Muslim societies.

Israeli Hebrew media “revealed”, quoting from “western sources”, that the Jordanian intelligence service informed the Israeli side that “there is a commando operation about to happen in the south”. The media added that: “The Israeli intelligence services were aware that a group of what they call “terrorists” was planning to perpetrate an operation in the south” – what means that the operation was well prepared by Israel with the help of other secret services of the region. The israeli military spoke about the attacks in which the “perpetrators” used heavy weapons, rifles and explosives which targeted a transportation bus carrying IDF soldiers and passengers, a military patrol and a private car.

The Israeli intelligence organization Shabak said very clearly some weeks ago that a large “rolling operation” would be carried out soon by a large number of militants in the same area where the Thursday operation took place. This means that they knew what would happened, in the same way as a cook knows what food he will serve.???

According to israeli TV and radio in hebrew language, quoting from statements of Israeli army commanders, the operation “was well prepared” and the attackers were a “large number” of militants working in multiple teams which had been well trained and had full knowledge of fighting and hiding along the border” – what means that the fighters had been at the fortified border where Israel has planted cameras and sensitive electronic devices which can even capture the movements of ants, which was the place where the alleged operations took place.

Certainly there are strategic motives and interests of the Israelis, which led to the occurrence of this operation at such a particular time. Among them

  • Re-issuance of security arrangements on the border of the Sinai, which Israel is trying to raise again since the overthrow of former Egyptian president Hosni Mubarak, claiming that there are risks that threaten the security Israel at the border of Sinai.
  • Sending indirect message to the international community and to the Egyptian military council which states that Egypt is in big
    danger if the “Islamic movements” are allowed access to power – what means that Israel is in interfering Egypt internal affairs by perpetrating such attacks near the border of Sinai. These synthetic terror attacks are a way of strong-arming Egypt into compliance with zionist wishes by way of coercion. It is essential that Israel is not allowed to get away with their usual mob-tactics.
  • To defend the current dictatorial regime in Syria, which provides the Israeli state of occupation a way to continue occupying the Golan Heights and to call the attention of the international community to the important-for-israel fact that overthrowing the Syrian regime would lead to a threat to Israeli security, just as is the case today on the Sinai border. 

    Quote from Haaretz: “Mubarak falls, Sinai terror rises. Whether the terrorists who carried out Thursday’s attacks exited Egypt, passed through Sinai and headed south toward the region of Eilat, or if this was the action of a terrorist cell of Islamic origin acting for some time already in Sinai. In any case, it is clear that the Egyptian revolution that began in Tahrir Square and spread through other Arab states has now made its way into Israel.”

    This last quote from Haaretz, which like all israeli media is little more than an outlet for official opinion and propaganda, is revealing. It tells us that any measure of democracy in Arab countries is inimical to israel, and that they will do everything in their power to destroy or subvert all developments towards true democracy in Arab and Islamic countries.

  • To circumvent the (alleged) Palestinian project of declaration of a Palestinian state in order to help Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas, who continues holding secret meetings in Israel and in the western countries with his former partner of the deadly agreement, the so called “Oslo agreement”, Shimon Peres, so that he can continue playing his dirty political game of manipulating and auctioning off of the rights of the Palestinian people, sucking their blood and funds to feed them into his sons bank accounts and projects, and finding more and more excuses to postpone the request for the declaration of a Palestinian state – under occupation – in the United Nations.
  •  Legitimizing the bombing of Gaza and the continued siege and imposing further restrictions on the million and half Palestinians living in this concentration camp and urging the Egyptians to take ever stricter action against Gaza, as well as inciting them against the Palestinians by implying that Palestinians are the real enemies of Egypt and a big threat to their security.According to Palestinian sources, the Israeli warplanes have bombarded the Gaza Strip since yesterday. This is a serious escalation, and Palestinian medical sources said that six Palestinians were murdered among them a child, Atef Mahmoud Abu Samra, 13, and several wounded by the targeted Israeli bombing of a house in the residential district Shaath west of Rafah, hours after the three attacks took place along the border with Egypt. Also, unspecified shelling of targets along the Egyptian border has been reported. 
  • To make a big spectacle for the visiting vassals from the USA Congress. Currently 81 members of the USA Congress are in israel on an indoctrination tour, and this incident will certainly be used to the maximum to “convince” these traitors to their own nation that the needs of israel have priority over everything else.
  • To distract the israeli population from their own problems. Since weeks people are camping out in Tel Aviv and other places to demonstrate against the extremely ruinous conduct of affairs of the gevernment of israel. Since antiquity one of the preferred methods of criminal elites to force their populations into acquiescence has been the a common enemy or danger, most often than not invented. The range of issues brought forward by the protesting people could speed the implosion of israel as the refugee of criminality which it is under those currently in power.

(August 19th, 2011 / www.kawther.info / 05.08.2012)

How the Israeli Quintet Indicted Itself The Murder of Arafat

“We have to get rid of Arafat”

~Israeli defense Minister Shaul Mofaz to Prime Minister Sharon caught on an open mic

Source: Haaretz (Hebrew)

“We operated against Ahmed Yassin and Abdel-Aziz al-Rantissi [two Palestinian leaders extrajudicially assassinated by Israel] when we thought the time was suitable. On the matter of Arafat we’ll operate in the same way, when we find the convenient and suitable time. One needs to find the time and to do what has to be done.”

~ Israeli Prime Minister Sharon to Ma’ariv newspaper

Source: The Guardian

Yasser Arafat may be dead, but for all intents and purposes he lives on and continues to be a thorn in Israel’s side. Earlier this month a Swiss doctor announced that high levels of toxic polonium-210 were found on some of Arafat’s belongings. Polonium-210 is a highly radioactive substance, one that would require a nuclear reactor and expertise to produce and handle. Israel, being a nuclear power and having publicly expressed a motive for Arafat’s “elimination,” fits the description.

Swiss doctor Francois Bochud, director of the Institute of Radiation Physics in Lausanne, Switzerland, was quoted in the report on a nine-month investigation by Al Jazeera that “We have evidence there is too much polonium, but we also have hints from the medical records that this may not be the case. The only way to resolve this anomaly would be by testing the body.”

If exhumation and examination of Arafat’s body (currently reposing in its tomb, located a  half a kilometer from my home) seven years after his death reveals the presence of polonium-210, the question demanding an answer will be: who killed him and why?

It may seem a futile task to focus on a single person’s death when the region is engulfed in wholesale killing, until, that is, you realize that the killing of Arafat was meant to be an accelerator in the process of bringing about the wholesale demise of an entire indigenous people.

A Palestinian attorney in the Galilee has pointed the finger at those he believes are most likely responsible for the murder of former Palestinian president Yasser Arafat. The accused are named and their histories cited; their own words indict them, and their acts of sustained violence speak volumes.

The charge sheet incriminates five of Israel’s top brass:

1-    Ariel Sharon, in his capacity as Prime Minister of the Government of Israel, 2001-2006 (currently reported as being clinically dead);

2-    Avi Dichter, as head of the Shin Bet (Israeli internal security), 2000-2005 (Member of Knesset for Kadima Party);

3-    Shaul Mofaz, in his capacity as Israeli Minister of Defense, 2003-2006 (now leader of the Kadima Party);

4-    Moshe Ya’alon, in his capacity as Chief of Staff of the Israeli army, 2003-2005 (now a Deputy Prime Minister of Israel);

5-    Meir Dagan, as Director of the Mossad from 2002 to 2011 (currently a leader of a movement called “Yesh Sikkui”).

The person who has made these accusations is Palestinian-Arab Israeli writer and lawyer, Sabri Jiryis, a graduate of the Hebrew University law faculty and a prominent Palestinian activist with Arafat’s political party, Fatah. For a long time, Mr. Jiryis served as Arafat’s adviser on Israeli affairs as well as serving as the director of the Palestine Research Centre in Lebanon and later in Cyprus. He was one of Arafat’s confidants for decades, until Arafat’s death.

Mr. Jiryis has just posted on his website a revealing analysis of the historic context leading up to Arafat’s assassination, entitled: Arafat’s Murder – The Crime and its Ramifications. The essay was posted in Arabic which may limit the non-Arabic-speaking world’s benefit from this insider’s exposé.

Bottom line: Mr. Jiryis meticulously assembles and presents hard evidence demonstrating why these five Israeli leaders, in particular, should be brought before a court of justice. His analysis offers no words of rage or revenge but rather a cold, clinical review of a systematic series of actions and statements by each of these Israeli leaders which would logically bring any objective observer to the conclusion that, if justice is to be served, these five persons should be charged with Arafat’s murder and put on trial.

Following the Al-Jazeera airing of their documentary concluding that Arafat may have been poisoned by radioactive polonium, Mahmoud Abbas, Arafat’s successor, ordered an investigation into Arafat’s death. In reply, in Cairo, on July 17, 2012, the Arab League set up an independent committee to probe the death of the iconic former Palestinian leader.

As the independent investigation committee embarks on its mandate, Mr. Jiryis’ analysis can make an important contribution by putting Arafat’s murder into historical context. Israeli leaders have employed murder, assassination and mass slaughter ever since Israel’s founding, and before. The reins of power in Israel remain in the hands of those who seek to murder the Palestinian struggle for freedom and independence. Meantime, when Arafat’s turn finally came, the trail of evidence left behind was so glaring that it would be an insult to humanity if those responsible are not brought to justice.

Whatever happens with this renewed effort to determine how Arafat died and who was behind his death, the Palestinian struggle for emancipation from 65 years of dispossession and 45 years of military occupation will not end. The idea that Palestinians are going to wake up one morning and decide to enjoy life under Israeli military occupation or as refugees is simply hallucinatory, as any thoughtful reading of world history would indicate.

Historic twists of fate are unpredictable, with many ironic overtones. Maybe, just maybe, the analysis by an Israeli-trained Palestinian attorney together with the clues to be found in Arafat’s dead body will usher in a long-overdue era of Israeli accountability for crimes against the Palestinian people.

(www.uruknet.info / 05.08.2012)

Is al Qaeda fighting in Syria?

Islamist militants claim allegiance to the Free Syrian Army

In an image taken from a video posted in February 2012 to Youtube, a group of heavily armed militants claim allegiance to the Free Syrian Army.

(CBS News) LONDON – Concern has mounted for months that Islamic extremists are joining the fight against Syrian President Bahsar Assad’s dictatorship, and now a New York Times report says there’s increasing evidence that al Qaeda militants are trying to commandeer the fight for their own cause.

The focus has been on claims that al Qaeda fighters from Iraq’s Sunni heartland are coming across the border to fight their long-running sectarian battle against Shiite Muslims on new territory – with the apparent goal, once Assad is ousted, of being able to carve out a Sunni homeland under strict Islamic law.

Syria’s prominent opposition groups flatly reject the notion that Islamic extremists are a significant force within the anti-Assad fight. They know it would not help their cause as they seek further support from the U.S. and other sympathetic nations.

But senior Iraqi officials have warned that militants – including al Qaeda in Iraq fighters – are crossing the border.

An aide to the Iraqi prime minister is quoted in the Times Wednesday as saying that his nation was “100 percent sure from security coordination with Syrian authorities that the wanted names that we have are the same wanted names that the Syrian authorities have, especially within the last three months.”

“Al Qaeda that is operating in Iraq is the same as that which is operating in Syria,” Izzat al-Shahbandar, the Iraqi leader’s aide, said Tuesday.

Iraq, a majority Shiite nation, has good reason to fear an al Qaeda presence on its doorstep.

Syria in crisis

   

A geographical region which spans the border between the two nations, known as the Levant, is firm Sunni territory – from which al Qaeda in Iraq drew many of its fighters for the battle against the post-Saddam, Shiite-led government. (That battle continues today, long after the withdrawal of the last U.S forces from Iraq.)

Syria is a majority Sunni nation, but has been ruled by the Assad family – from the minority Alawite sect – for four decades.

It is worth noting that not all Sunni Islamist militants are created equal. Several Sunni tribal sheiks in western Iraq told The Telegraph in March they were sending men to join the rebels in Syria – but they spoke of al Qaeda as an enemy. The sheiks were, in some cases, the same men who led the Sunni “awakening” groups which helped U.S. forces quash al Qaeda’s hold on Western Iraq.

“Al Qaeda are no way sending people to Syria to fight the regime,” Sheik Hamid al-Hayis, one of the local tribal leaders told the paper, while acknowledging that the global terror franchise does tend to “seek out unstable areas.”

Another sheik, Ashour Juru al-Bu Mahal, even went so far as to say his fighters would be able to “hold off al Qaeda” in Syria if the group did try to claim territory there. “We have experience,” he said. “We have fought against them before. We know how to do it.”

Tangible evidence that al Qaeda – the terror network led by Ayman al-Zawahiri and based along the Pakistan-Afghanistan border – is involved at an operational level in the Syria violence is minimal, but that may be less important than the trends highlighted by the Times article, which show an increase in al Qaeda-esque tactics.

Videos showing Islamic militants who superficially look and sound like al Qaeda, carrying messages claiming affiliation with and even allegiance to, the rebel Free Syrian Army (FSA), have surfaced. In one video cited by the Times, rocket launcher-wielding men in face masks say they are defected Syrian Army troops who have now joined the FSA, as they announce the creation of a suicide “martyr’s brigade.”

Suicide bombing is a preferred tactic of al Qaeda and its franchises around the world. According to a study cited by the Times, there have been 10 suicide bombings in Syria since December. Four of them have been claimed by the al Nusra Front for the People of the Levant.

The Times article reports military and intelligence officials believe al Nusra and two other groups, Abdullah Azzam Brigades and Al Baraa ibn Malik Martyrdom Brigade, are linked to al Qaeda.

Al Qaeda, however, has yet to espouse any of the groups in Syria as an affiliate or franchise – along the lines of al Qaeda in Iraq, or North Africa’s al Qaeda in the Islamic Magreb. The closest to that syndication for Syria has been a remark from al Zawahiri in the winter, praising Syrian opposition fighters as the “lions of the Levant” and urging Syrians to join their ranks – but asserting no support beyond that.

And, in spite of the similar language and attire seen and heard in their videos, none of the Sunni militant groups fighting Assad in Syria is known to have claimed a link to al Qaeda.

But while the link between Syria’s Sunni militant groups and al Qaeda-central may be limited to a shared ideology, the reality on the ground may be no less disconcerting.

CBS News analysis of opposition videos from Syria over the past months suggests there are not three, but myriad Islamist factions which have taken up arms against the Assad regime – many of them claiming allegiance to the FSA, and many using language and suggesting tactics commonly associated with al Qaeda.

These groups – contrary to their claims of membership in the FSA – appear to be as factitious and regionalized as the Syrian opposition movement itself. They are essentially local Sunni militias.

The fear, then, that al-Zawahiri and his cadres will try and set up a new headquarters in Damascus if and when President Assad falls, may be less well-founded than a fear over the complete chaos he would likely leave in his wake, and what that chaos might facilitate.

An array of well-armed Sunni militant groups vying for a cut of the post-Assad power, in a nation with stockpiles of chemical and biological weapons and a shared border with Israel, is worrying enough.

If al Qaeda isn’t in Syria now, its leaders will almost certainly have their fingers on the doorbell if and when Assad does fall.

(www.cbsnews.com / 05.08.2012)

Al Saud betrays, fools Muslim Ummah: Political analyst

The sacredness of Mecca and Medina is being used by the Saudi regime to fool around, to fool the Saudi citizens and to fool the Muslim Ummah and the international community at large.”

Syed Ali Wasif, president of Society for International Reforms and Research, Washington

A political analyst says the repressive regime of Al Saud betrays and fools the Saudi citizens and the entire Muslim world, Press TV reports.

“What they (Saudi regime) are doing is they are betraying the common Muslims in the name of Mecca and Medina, and their sacredness,” said Syed Ali Wasif, the president of Society for International Reforms and Research in Washington, in an interview with Press TV on Sunday.

“The sacredness of Mecca and Medina is being used by the Saudi regime to fool around, to fool the Saudi citizens and to fool the Muslim Ummah and the international community at large.” 

Since February 2011, protesters have held demonstrations on an almost regular basis in Saudi Arabia, mainly in the Qatif region and the town of Awamiyah in the oil-rich Eastern Province, primarily calling for the release of all political prisoners, freedom of expression and assembly, and an end to widespread discrimination.

However, the demonstrations have turned into protests against the Al Saud regime, especially since November 2011, when Saudi security forces killed five protesters and injured many others in the Eastern Province.

On August 3, Saudi security forces killed 18-year-old Hussain Yousef al-Qallaf in Qatif.

Wasif stated that the anti-regime protesters in Saudi Arabia “are under a single leadership, under a single banner and they are moving ahead in the right direction to oust the Saudi regime in that region.”

According to Human Rights Watch, the Saudi regime “routinely represses expression critical of the government.”

(www.presstv.ir / 05.08.2012)

‘Als islam voorschrijft dat wij onze lichamen moeten bedekken, houden wij ons daar aan’

De Saoedische atleten tijdens de openingsceremonie.

Marcel Duyvestijn meet met twee maten, vindt Nourdeen Wildeman, als het gaat om een judoka, haar vader en het IOC.

  •  Maar goed, je moet zoiets natuurlijk wel een beetje in een donker hokje plaatsen als je een opiniestuk schrijft.

‘Wat zou het mooi zijn als Wojdan haar hoofddoek op houdt: Ippon’
Op donderdag 2 augustus publiceerde Volkskrant.nl een opiniestuk van Marcel Duyvestijn. Hij schrijft hoe mooi het zou zijn als de Saoedische judoka Wojdan Ali Seraj Abdulrahim Shaherkani vlak voor de wedstrijd haar hoofddoek af zou doen. Voor de vrijheid om de hoofddoek niet te dragen schrijven mensen doorgaans nu eenmaal hartstochtelijker dan de vrijheid van een vrouw om de hoofddoek wél te dragen. Maar goed, terug naar het onderwerp.

Het IOC heeft uiteindelijk de judoka toegestaan om op de mat te komen met haar hoofddoek. Duyvestijn staat stil bij de vraag hoe ver je moet gaan om aan orthodoxe (lees: strenggelovige, strikte) eisen in te gaan. Waar ligt de grens? Wat voor teken geef je af als je toegeeft? Op zichzelf opmerkelijk, omdat de verplichting van het correct bedekken van het lichaam (op een enkeling hier en daar na) een algemeen geaccepteerde islamitische richtlijn is en helemaal niet specifiek streng orthodox. Maar goed, je moet zoiets natuurlijk wel een beetje in een donker hokje plaatsen als je een opiniestuk schrijft.

Het antwoord op de vraag waar de grens ligt, heeft Duyvestijn ook een antwoord. Hij vindt het belangrijk dat je aangeeft wat voor land je bent, open en eerlijk. Dat je benoemt wat je kernnormen en waarden zijn en zegt: ‘Dat zijn onze waarden. En daar gaan we niet mee marchanderen. Punt.’

Blijkbaar komt het niet in hem op dat ook de Saoedische judoka voor zichzelf afvraagt waar de grens ligt? Wat voor teken geeft zij af als ze aan de eisen van de IOC toegeeft in plaats van het gebod vanuit islam en de wens van haar vader? Opmerkelijk dat Duyvestijn het juist prachtig zou vinden als de judoka haar normen en waarden opgeeft en toegeeft aan het IOC; het tegenovergestelde van wat we volgens hem zelf zouden moeten doen.

Beste Marcel Duyvestijn. De correcte bedekking van het lichaam en alle andere zaken die God ons middels de islam heeft verplicht of verboden, dát zijn ónze waarden. En daar gaan we niet mee marchanderen. Punt. Als de islam ons voorschrijft dat wij onze lichamen moeten bedekken, dan houden wij ons daar aan. Punt. Vol punt. Ippon.

(Nourdeen Wildeman / www.volkskrant.nl/vk / 05.08.2012)

Palestinian Genocide

For anti-racist Jews and indeed all anti-racist humanitarians the core moral messages from the Jewish Holocaust (5-6 million dead, 1 in 6 dying from deprivation) and from the more general WW2 European Holocaust (30 million Slav, Jewish and Gypsy dead) are “zero tolerance for racism”, “bear witness”, “zero tolerance for lying” and “never again to anyone”, anyone including the Indigenous Palestinian victims of the racist Zionist Palestinian Genocide (Google “Palestinian Genocie” ) – 2 million dead since 1936, 0.1 million from violence, 1,9 million from war-, expulsion- and occupation-derived deprivation; 7 million refugees; 4.1 million Occupied Palestinians deprived of ALL the human rights listed by the Universal Declaration of Human Rights ; 6 million Palestinians forbidden to even live in the homeland continuously inhabited by their forbears to the very dawn of agrarian civilization; 800,000 Palestinians children confined without charge or trial to what the Catholic Church has described as Israel’s Gaza Concentration Camp for the asserted “crime” of being Indigenous Palestinians living in a tiny, remorselessly Zionist-bombed patch of Palestine .

Ed Miliband’s parents are anti-racist Jews who believe in justice for the 12 million Indigenous Palestinians of whom only the adults of the 1.6 million Palestinian Israelis (i.e. about 6.7%) can vote for the government ruling all of Palestine plus an ethnically cleansed slab of Syria. Ed Milliband as an elected politician in an ostensible democracy either believes in one man one vote NOW for everyone (including Palestinians) or he doesn’t – if he doesn’t he should be kicked out at the first opportunity by the Labor Party and the voters of Doncaster North.

Ed Miliband merely trots out the mantra “I support a two-state solution because I long for the peace that both Palestinians and Israelis need so badly” – yet if he had offered the same opinion about Apartheid Israel-supported Apartheid South Africa “I support a two-state solution involving 90% of the country for the Whites and 10% for the majority Non-Europeans in uneconomic Bantustans” his political career would have been finished.

Disraeli (a convert to “God is an Englishman” Anglicanism) was a mass murderer complicit in the Irish Famine (1 million starved to death, 1-2 million forced into exile), the butchery of 10 million Indians in the decade after the 1857 Indian Rebellion, and genocidal atrocities in all parts of the British Empire, not least in India where 500 million Indians died avoidably from British imposed deprivation under Queen Victoria alone (1837-1901) (read my books “Body Count. Global avoidable mortality since 1950″ and “Jane Austen and the Black Hole of British History” now available for free perusal on the Web ).

From an extremely charitable anti-racist Jewish perspective Ed Miliband is at the very least “confused” and should seek moral guidance from a large body of outstanding anti-racist Jews from Arendt to Zinn (Google “Jews Against Racist Zionism”). As a refugee from both the anti-racist and anti-Zionist Orthodox Jewish tradition and from the anti-racist, anti-Zionist secular Jewish tradition, Ed Miliband should also seek moral guidance from a large body of outstanding anti-racist non-Jews including the likes of Nobel Laureates Nelson Mandela, Desmond Tutu, Jimmy Carter, Máiread Maguire and José Saramago who have unequivocally condemned the ongoing Palestinian Genocide by Apartheid Israel (Google “Non-Jews Against Racist Zionism”).

This site is a compendium of the authoritative views  of outstanding anti-racist humanitarians bearing witness to the ongoing Palestinian Holocaust that is a Palestine Genocide  as defined by Article 2 of the UN Genocide Convention. Indeed this website provides an alphabetical listing of the documented views of numerous people and organizations referring to the Palestinian Genocide or to related terms such as Palestinian holocaust, Palestinian ethnic cleaning, Palestinian liquidation. 

The situation in Palestine has been recently described as a Palestinian Holocaust by Palestinian scholar Dr Elias Akleh, exiled from his homeland and now living in the US (see: http://www.countercurrents.org/akleh040308.htm ). It has been frequently described by others as a Palestinian Genocide, a term that is amply justified in relation to the definitions of the  UN Genocide Convention as outlined below.

Article 2 of the UN Genocide Convention (see: http://www.edwebproject.org/sideshow/genocide/convention.html ) states:

“In the present Convention, genocide means any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnic, racial or religious group, as such: a) Killing members of the group; b) Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group; c) Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part; d) Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group; e) Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group”.

Using the latest available UN Agency data we can systematically analyze these UN Genocide Convention points thus.

“Intent to  destroy in whole or in part” -  sustained (and frequently asserted) intent over about 150 years  of the Zionist colonial project; 0.75 million Palestinian refugees in 1948; currently 7 million Palestinian refugees, and 4.2 million Palestinian refugees registered with the UN in the Middle East; over 40 years of illegal Israeli Occupation of the West Bank and Gaza; 0.1 million 1948-2011 violent Palestinian deaths, post-1967 excess deaths 0.3 million; post-1967 under-5 infant deaths 0.2 million; 3,600 under-5 year old Occupied Palestinian Territory (OPT) infants die avoidably EACH YEAR in the OPT “Prison” due to Apartheid Israeli war crimes.

a) Killing -   about 5100,000 Palestinians killed since 1948; post-1967 excess deaths 0.3 million; post-1967 under-5 infant deaths 0.2 million; 3,600 under-5 year old Occupied Palestinian Territory (OPT) infants die avoidably EACH YEAR in the OPT “Prison” due to Israeli ignoring of the Geneva Convention; 254 OPT Palestinians killed by the Israeli military in the LAST 2 MONTHS OF 2008 ALONE, 301 killed thus last year (latest UNRWA data; see above).

b) Causing serious bodily or mental harm -  see (a) and the shocking UNICEF reports of the appalling conditions psychologically scarring OPT children: http://www.unicef.org/infobycountry/oPt.html .

(c) Conditions to cause destruction in whole or in part - see (a) and (b); Professor Noam Chomsky describes the OPT as a highly abusive “Prison”; others use the valid term “Concentration Camp” and make parallels with the Warsaw Ghetto; one has to turn to US-guarded Vietnamese hamlets and the Nazi era atrocities to see routine, horrendously violent and deadly military policing of civilian concentration camps.

(d) Measures intended to prevent births -  see (a), (b), and (c) above; dozens of pregnant women dying at road blocks; other killing of pregnant Palestinian women; huge infant mortality in the OPT with the Occupier in gross violation of the Geneva Convention.

(e) Forcible transferring of children – irreversible transferring by killing of children – 0.2 million post-invasion infant deaths; 27 OPT children violently killed in the LAST WEEK ALONE; mass imprisonment of 2 million OPT children; hundreds of Palestinian children in abusive Israeli high-security prisons in Israel; forcible separation of families by racist Israeli Apartheid Laws, marriage laws and immigration laws.

For all anti-racist humanitarians – and anti-racist Jews in particular - the core moral messages from the WW2 Jewish Holocaust (5-6 million dead, 1 in 6 dying from deprivation) and from the more general WW2 European Holocaust (30 million Slav, Jewish and Gypsy dead) are “zero tolerance for racism”, “never again to anyone”, “bear witness” and “zero tolerance for lying”.

However these sacred injunctions are grossly violated by the anti-Arab anti-Semitic racist Zionists running Apartheid Israel and their Western backers variously involved in the ongoing Palestinian Genocide, Iraqi Genocide and Afghan Genocide (post-invasion violent and non-violent excess deaths 0.3 million, 2.3 million and 3-7 million, respectively; post-invasion under-5 infant deaths 0.2 million, 0.6 million and 2.3 million, respectively; refugees totalling 7 million, 5-6 million and 3-4 million, respectively, plus a further 2.5 million NW Pakistan Pashtun refugees) (for details and documentation see “Muslim Holocaust, Muslim Genocide”: ).

All decent, anti-racist, humanitarians must vigorously oppose and sideline those supporting racist Zionism, Apartheid Israel and racist Western wars and occupations who are currently complicit in  0.7 million non-violent excess deaths annually; continuing, racist perversion of human rights, humanitarian  values and rational discourse in the Western democracies; ignoring of worsening climate genocide (that may kill 10 billion non-Europeans this century through unaddressed man-made climate change); and egregious anti-Jewish anti-Semitism through falsely identifying decent, anti-racist Jews with these appalling crimes.

This site is inspired by our obligation to the 30 million victims of the WW2 European Holocaust  and indeed to the victims of all other holocaust and genocide atrocities such as the 35 million Chinese killed by the Japanese in WW2 and the 6-7 million Indians starved to death by the British in the 1943-1945 WW2 Bengal Famine (see Gideon Polya, “Body Count. Global avoidable mortality since 1950”, G.M. Polya, Melbourne, 2007: http://globalbodycount.blogspot.com/  ; Gideon Polya, “Australian complicity in Iraq mass mortality” in  “Lies, Deep Fries & Statistics” (edited by Robyn Williams, ABC Books, Sydney, 2007): http://www.abc.net.au/rn/science/ockham/stories/s1445960.htm ); Gideon Polya,  “Jane Austen and the Black Hole of British History. Colonial rapacity, holocaust denial and the crisis in biological sustainability”, G.M. Polya, Melbourne, 1998, 2008:http://janeaustenand.blogspot.com/; and  see recent BBC broadcast “Bengal Famine” involving Dr Polya, Economics Nobel Laureate Professor Amartya Sen and other scholars: http://www.open2.net/thingsweforgot/bengalfamine_programme.html ).

This site is also inspired by the words of outstanding Jewish American scholar Professor Jared Diamond who in his best-selling book “Collapse” (Prologue, p10, Penguin edition) enunciated the “moral principle, namely that it is morally wrong for one people to dispossess, subjugate, or exterminate another people” – an injunction grossly violated by racist Zionist (RZ)-run Apartheid Israel and its racist, genocide-committing and genocide-ignoring US Alliance backers.

As perceived by UK  writer Alan Hart in his recent book “Zionism: the Real Enemy of the Jews. Volume 1. The False Messiah”” (Clarity Press), racist Zionism represents an immense threat not just to the Arab and Muslim World but also to decent, anti-racist, humanitarian Jews throughout the World (see:

http://www.claritypress.com/Hart-I.html ).

The Palestinian Genocide is part of the so-called  US Alliance  War on Terror that in horrible reality is a cowardly, racist US Alliance and racist Zionist War on Women and Children and a War on Palestinian, Iraqi, Lebanese, Syrian, Somali, Iraqi, Iranian, Afghan, Pakistani, Arab, Muslim, Asian and non-European Women and Children.

As of mid-2009, in the Occupied Palestinian, Iraqi and Afghan Territories post-invasion non-violent excess deaths total 0.3 million, 1.0 million and 3.2 million, respectively; post-invasion violent deaths total about 11,000, 1.3 million and up to 4 million, respectively; post-invasion violent plus non-violent excess deaths total 0.3 million, 2.3 million and 3-7 million, respectively; post-invasion under-5 infant deaths total 0.2 million, 0.6 million and 2.3 million, respectively; and refugees total 7 million, 5-6 million and 3-4 million, respectively (plus a further 2.5 million Pashtun refugees in NW Pakistan). This constitutes a Palestinian, Iraqi and Afghan Genocide as defined by Article 2 of the UN Genocide Convention; and egregious war crimes due in part to Occupier war criminal non-supply of life-sustaining food and medical requisites demanded unequivocally by Articles 55 and 56 of the Geneva Convention Relative to the Protection of Civilian Persons in Time of War – thus the Gaza Concentration Camp has been under US-backed Israeli blockade for 2 years and according to WHO the “total annual per capita medical expenditure” permitted by the Occupiers in Iraq and Occupied Afghanistan is US$124 and US$29, respectively, as compared to US$6,714 for the US.”

As of 2011:

In 1880 there were about 0.5 million Indigenous Palestinians. Of the  25,000 Jews in Palestine half were immigrants (see: http://www.palestineremembered.com/Acre/Palestine-Remembered/Story559.html and http://www.mideastweb.org/palpop.htm ).  Palestinian casualties of war violence total about 80,000 since 1948 and about 100,000 since 1936 (see “Palestinian casualties of war”.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Palestinian_casualties_of_war ). However one must also consider avoidable Palestinian deaths from war-, expulsion- and occupation-imposed deprivation that now total about 1.9 million since 1948. Palestinian refugees  total about 7 million. This has been a Palestinian Genocide as defined by Article 2 of the UN Genocide Convention.

According to the  Israeli Foreign Ministry: “From 1920 through 1999, a total of 2,500 residents of Mandatory Palestine and, since 1948, the State of Israel fell victims to hostile enemy action; in most cases, terrorist attacks” (see: http://www.mfa.gov.il/MFA/Terrorism-+Obstacle+to+Peace/Palestinian+terror+before+2000/ ) and “1,218 people have been killed by Palestinian violence and terrorism since September 2000” (see: http://www.mfa.gov.il/MFA/Terrorism-+Obstacle+to+Peace/Palestinian+terror+since+2000/Victims+of+Palestinian+Violence+and+Terrorism+sinc.htm ).

The race-based, racist Zionist-run Apartheid State of Israel is a democracy by genocide. Of about 12 million Palestinians only the adults of 1.6 million Palestinian  Israelis  (21% of the Israeli population) can vote for the government ruling all of Palestine plus part of Lebanon and a near-completely ethnically cleansed part of Syria, albeit as third class citizens. 1.6 million Occupied Palestinians are abusively confined to the Gaza Concentration Camp and 2.7 million Occupied Palestinians live under highly abusive military rule in West Bank Bantustans. About 6 million Palestinians are forbidden  to even live in Palestine. There are  5.9 million Jewish Israelis and 0.3 million non-Jewish and non-Arab Israelis.

Since 1936, the ongoing Palestinian Genocide has involved  about 2.0 million war- and occupation-related Palestinian deaths, 0.1 million Palestinians killed violently (see: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Palestinian_casualties_of_war ) , 1.9 million avoidable Palestinian deaths from  war- , occupation- and expulsion-imposed deprivation, 7 million refugees.  3,000 Palestinian infants are  passively murdered by Apartheid Israel each year, and 0.8 million Palestinian children are abusively  confined to the Gaza Concentration Camp for the “crime” of being Indigenous Palestinians.

Each year Apartheid Israel passively kills about 3,000 Occupied Palestinian infants, passively murders about 5,600 Occupied Palestinians through deprivation and violently kills another circa 600 Occupied Palestinians. Decent anti-racists around the World must  Boycott Apartheid Israel and its racist supporters just as it successfully boycotted Apartheid Israel-supported Apartheid South Africa after the Sharpeville Massacre (69 Africans killed)  (see: https://sites.google.com/site/boycottapartheidisrael/ ). The racist Zionists and their supporters, notably the Neocon American and Zionist Imperialists (NAZIs),  must be sidelined in public life as have been like racists such as the Nazis, neo-Nazis, Apartheiders and KKK (see “Palestinian  Genocide”: https://sites.google.com/site/palestiniangenocide/  and the recent book “The Plight of the Palestinians”:http://mwcnews.net/focus/analysis/4047-the-plight-of-the-palestinians.html ).

(sites.google.com / 05.08.2012)

Na de moord in Rafah … Netanyahu dreigt: onze arm is lang

  Na de moord bedreigt onze arm Parvhantnaaho lange

Netanyahu en de chef-staf Uzi Dayan

Jeruzalem  – De Israëlische premier Benjamin Netanyahu heeft het Palestijns verzet gedreigd dat Israël een lange arm heeft en terroristen zal vinden. Netanyahu prees zijn leger en de Algemene Veiligheidsdienst (Shin Bet), nadat ze een operatie hadden ondernomen in de Gaza Strip, gericht tegen een cel behorende bij de wereldwijde Jihad. Deze cel zou een aanslag willen plegen tegen Israëlische soldaten aan de  Egyptische grens.
De bezettingsmacht vermoorde zondagmiddag de 22 jarige jongeman Okal met een raket vanuit een drone.  De jongeman reed op zijn motorfiets ten westen van Rafah in het uiterste zuiden van de Gaza Strip. Bij de aanval is een andere jongeman gewond geraakt.
Netanyahu zei: “Iedereen die van plan is om aan te vallen, moet weten dat onze arm lang is en dat we hem altijd zullen vinden.” Israëlische bronnen zeiden dat de martelaar Okal deel had genomen aan een actie aan de grens met Egypte in juni, die geleidt had tot de dood van een werknemer en verwonding van anderen die bezig waren aan de constructie van een wand.  Er zou een Salafistische groepering hier achter zitten en men heeft aangegeven dat er twee Egyptische en een  Saoedische aanvallers waren geweest.

(vrij vertaald vanuit Arabisch van een artikel van Safa.ps / 05.08.2012)